Ford Mustang VII Convertible
Car comparison
Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8vsFord Mustang VI Convertible · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VI Convertible · Facelift 2017
GT/CS 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Lightest1,743 kg3,843 lb
- Best power-to-weight258 hp/t193 kW/t3.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk332 L
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best economy score76/100
Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Best practicality score46/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 446hp333kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 540Nm398lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,801kg3,971lb | 1,743kg3,843lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,150kg4,740lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 65.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 54.2s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.0s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 17.7s Calculated | 16.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.8s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK | 11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.1s Calculated | 12.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 248hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated | 258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated | 303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 526km327mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 5,038cc307cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,810mm189in | 4,789mm189in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,408mm55in | 1,396mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,719mm107in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,585mm62in | 1,642mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,642mm65in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 332L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | - | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 5,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.8 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.0 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 17.7 s | 16.6 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.6 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.1 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.1 s | 12.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 176 km/h 109 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 has 4 hp more than Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8 and Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 1,801 kg 3,971 lb |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,743 kg 3,843 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 5.0 s |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.5 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
| 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
| 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 446 hp 333 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.0 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,801 kg 3,971 lb | 1,743 kg 3,843 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km 20.3 mpg US 24.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 526 km 327 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 332 L 11.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 258 hp/t 193 kW/t 3.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8 | Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK | 11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km | 20.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi | 32.67 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal | 1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year | 3,045 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8
- Has 11 Nm more
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 58 kg lighter
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 22 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























