Ford Mustang IV
Car comparison
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra RvsFord Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VII Convertible
GT 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score77/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8
- Most powerful446 hp333 kW
- Highest torque540 Nm398 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight248 hp/t185 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best economy score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 446hp333kW |
| Torque | 529Nm390lb-ft | 540Nm398lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,801kg3,971lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 65.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 17.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12L/100 km19.6mpg US23.5mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 248hp/t185kW/t112hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 318Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 300Nm/t201lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,810mm189in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,336mm53in | 1,408mm55in |
| Wheelbase | 2,573mm101in | 2,719mm107in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,585mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,642mm65in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 310L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 7,250 rpm | 5,100 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 17.7 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 176 km/h 109 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 390 hp 291 kW |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW |
Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8 has 56 hp more than Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R and Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8: 56 hp (42 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 1,801 kg 3,971 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 4.9 s |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 5.0 s |
Although Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8 has more power, Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R and Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | 446 hp 333 kW | 5.0 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | FordMustang VII ConvertibleGT 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 446 hp 333 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | 540 Nm 398 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,801 kg 3,971 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.0 L/100 km 19.6 mpg US 23.5 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 248 hp/t 185 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12 L/100 km19.6 mpg US23.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.80 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,800 L476 US gal396 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,150 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
- Is 136 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford Mustang VII Convertible GT 5.0 V8
- Has 56 hp more
- Has 11 Nm more
- Has 13 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























