Car comparison

BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0vsFord Mustang VI Convertible · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

BMW M4 Convertible (G83)

Competition 3.0

510 hp2993 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedCabriolet / convertible2021-2024
VS

Ford Mustang VI Convertible · Facelift 2017

GT/CS 5.0 V8

450 hp5038 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible2022-2023

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Most powerful
    510 hp
    380 kW
  • Highest torque
    650 Nm
    479 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    266 hp/t
    198 kW/t
    3.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.2 L/100 km
    23.1 mpg US
    27.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    578 km
    359 mi
  • Best overall score
    71/100
  • Best performance score
    83/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Power
510hp380kW
450hp336kW
Torque
650Nm479lb-ft
529Nm390lb-ft
Curb weight
1,920kg4,233lb
1,743kg3,843lb
Gross weight
2,345kg5,170lb
2,150kg4,740lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
249 km/h
155 mph
To 99% top speed
49.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
54.2s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
4.5s
0-200 km/h
13.2s
Calculated
16.6s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
4.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
10.2L/100 km23.1mpg US27.7mpg UK
11.6L/100 km20.3mpg US24.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
11.8s
Calculated
12.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
266hp/t198kW/t120hp/1000 lb
Calculated
258hp/t193kW/t117hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
339Nm/t227lb-ft/ton
Calculated
303Nm/t203lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
578km359mi
Calculated
526km327mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,993cc183cu in
5,038cc307cu in
Length
4,794mm189in
4,789mm189in
Width
1,887mm74in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,395mm55in
1,396mm55in
Wheelbase
2,857mm112in
2,720mm107in
Front track
1,617mm64in
1,642mm65in
Rear track
1,605mm63in
1,642mm65in
Ground clearance
121mm5in
144mm6in
Trunk volume
300L
332L
Max trunk volume
385L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
4
4
Fuel tank
59L
61L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8PowerTorque
  • BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0: Power / Torque
  • Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.06,250 rpm2,750-5,500 rpm7,200 rpm
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V87,000 rpm4,600 rpm7,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
4.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
4.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.2 s
16.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Limited
249 km/h
155 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.1 s
330 ft
101 m
5.0 s
5.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
8.2 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.9 s
10.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.8 s
12.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
191 km/h
119 mph
180 km/h
112 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0 has 60 hp more than Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0: 60 hp (45 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
1,920 kg
4,233 lb
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
1,743 kg
3,843 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
249 km/h
155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0 and Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0 and Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
266 hp/t
198 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
258 hp/t
193 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
510 hp
380 kW
3.7 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
450 hp
336 kW
4.5 s
249 km/h
155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,395 mm
54.9 in
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
332 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,789 mm
188.5 in
Height
1,396 mm
55.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
Power
510 hp
380 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Power
450 hp
336 kW
0-100 km/h4.5 s
Top speed
249 km/h
155 mph
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
3.7 s
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
4.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
BMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0
266 hp/t
198 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
258 hp/t
193 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleBMWM4 Convertible (G83)Competition 3.0FordMustang VI ConvertibleFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8
Power
510 hp
380 kW
450 hp
336 kW
Torque
650 Nm
479 lb-ft
529 Nm
390 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
4.5 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
249 km/h
155 mph
Lightness
1,920 kg
4,233 lb
1,743 kg
3,843 lb
Fuel consumption
10.2 L/100 km
23.1 mpg US
27.7 mpg UK
11.6 L/100 km
20.3 mpg US
24.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,794 mm
188.7 in
Height
1,395 mm
54.9 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
332 L
11.7 cu ft
Length
4,789 mm
188.5 in
Height
1,396 mm
55.0 in
Range score
578 km
359 mi
526 km
327 mi
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
332 L
11.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
266 hp/t
198 kW/t
3.8 kg/hp
258 hp/t
193 kW/t
3.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleBMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0Ford Mustang VI Convertible Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Consumption10.2 L/100 km23.1 mpg US27.7 mpg UK11.6 L/100 km20.3 mpg US24.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km17.85 LC100 km20.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi28.73 LC100 mi32.67 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,530 L404 US gal337 UK gal1,740 L460 US gal383 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,678 LC/year3,045 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0

  • Has 60 hp more
  • Has 121 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0
Ford Mustang VI Convertible GT/CS 5.0 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

BMW M4 Convertible (G83) Competition 3.0 vs Ford Mustang VI Convertible · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster