Ford Mustang IV
Car comparison
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra RvsMaserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati 3200 GT
3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.9 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque529 Nm390 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight234 hp/t175 kW/t4.3 kg/hp
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.7 L/100 km22.0 mpg US26.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk310 L
- Best overall score68/100
- Best performance score77/100
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Lightest1,590 kg3,505 lb
- Best economy score67/100
- Best practicality score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 370hp276kW |
| Torque | 529Nm390lb-ft | 491Nm362lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,590kg3,505lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,940kg4,277lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 75.4s99% target: 287 km/h / 178 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 5.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 16.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 23.6L/100 km10mpg US12.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 13.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 318Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 600km373mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 3,217cc196cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,510mm178in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,820mm72in |
| Height | 1,336mm53in | 1,310mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,573mm101in | 2,660mm105in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | - |
| Max trunk volume | - | 220L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R: Power / Torque
- Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 6,250 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 6,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 5.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 16.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 11.1 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 13.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 181 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 390 hp 291 kW |
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW |
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R has 20 hp more than Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V and Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 4.9 s |
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 5.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R and Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | 370 hp 276 kW | 5.1 s | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | Maserati3200 GT3.2 Biturbo V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 370 hp 276 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 5.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | Unrestricted 290 km/h180 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 15.0 L/100 km 15.7 mpg US 18.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 600 km 373 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 15 L/100 km15.7 mpg US18.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 26.25 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 42.25 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,250 L594 US gal495 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,938 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 38 Nm more
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Maserati 3200 GT 3.2 Biturbo V8 32V
- Is 75 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























