Ford Mustang IV
Car comparison
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra RvsFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
GT/CS 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.3 s
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption9.8 L/100 km24.0 mpg US28.8 mpg UK
- Largest trunk408 L
- Best overall score73/100
- Best performance score78/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score62/100
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph Unrestricted280 km/h174 mph Restricted
- Highest torque529 Nm390 lb-ft
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Lowest city consumption14.7 L/100 km16.0 mpg US19.2 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 529Nm390lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,682kg3,708lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 75.7s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 54.8s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.9s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 15.4s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.7s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 14.7L/100 km16mpg US19.2mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.7L/100 km22mpg US26.4mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.9s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 234hp/t175kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 318Nm/t213lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 492km306mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,601cc281cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,661mm184in | 4,789mm189in |
| Width | 1,857mm73in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,336mm53in | 1,382mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,573mm101in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,642mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,530mm60in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 310L | 408L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 59L | 61L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 6,000 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.7 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.9 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 15.4 s | 16.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.5 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.9 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.9 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 183 km/h 114 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 390 hp 291 kW |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 has 60 hp more than Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R.
The biggest power difference is between Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 4.9 s |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 and Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.9 s | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.3 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordMustang IV4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.9 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 295 km/h183 mph Restricted 280 km/h174 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 492 km 306 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 310 L 10.9 cu ft | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 234 hp/t 175 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Mustang IV 4.6 i V8 32V Cobra R
- Is 17 kg lighter
- Has 46 km/h (29 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Has 60 hp more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 98 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























