AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5)
Car comparison
AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5) 2.9 TFSI V6vsFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord Mustang VI · Facelift 2017
GT/CS 5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5) 2.9 TFSI V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.9 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful450 hp336 kW
- Highest torque600 Nm443 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.1 L/100 km33.1 mpg US39.8 mpg UK
- Best estimated range637 km396 mi
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score81/100
- Best economy score82/100
- Best practicality score73/100
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Lightest1,682 kg3,708 lb
- Best power-to-weight268 hp/t200 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 450hp336kW | 450hp336kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 529Nm390lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,720kg3,792lb | 1,682kg3,708lb |
| Gross weight | 2,320kg5,115lb | 2,105kg4,641lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 58.3s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 54.8s99% target: 247 km/h / 153 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.9s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.7s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.7s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 9.8L/100 km24mpg US28.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 262hp/t195kW/t119hp/1000 lb Calculated | 268hp/t200kW/t121hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 349Nm/t233lb-ft/ton Calculated | 315Nm/t210lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 637km396mi Calculated | 492km306mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,894cc177cu in | 5,038cc307cu in |
| Length | 4,783mm188in | 4,789mm189in |
| Width | 1,866mm73in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,387mm55in | 1,382mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,826mm111in | 2,720mm107in |
| Front track | 1,598mm63in | 1,642mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,588mm63in | 1,642mm65in |
| Ground clearance | - | 144mm6in |
| Trunk volume | - | 408L |
| Doors | 4 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 61L |
| CO2 emissions | 206g/km | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5) 2.9 TFSI V6: Power / Torque
- Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 5,700-6,700 rpm | 1,900-5,000 rpm | 6,950 rpm |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 4,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.7 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.9 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.7 s | 16.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 249 km/h 155 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.9 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.1 s | 10.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 185 km/h 115 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 450 hp 336 kW |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 249 km/h 155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 3.9 s |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5) 2.9 TFSI V6 and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5) 2.9 TFSI V6 and Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8: 3.3 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 637 km 396 mi |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 492 km 306 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 450 hp 336 kW | 3.9 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 450 hp 336 kW | 4.3 s | 249 km/h 155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 |
| 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5) 2.9 TFSI V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 3.9 s |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK |
| FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIRS5 Sportback (F5)2.9 TFSI V6 | FordMustang VIFacelift 2017GT/CS 5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 450 hp 336 kW | 450 hp 336 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 529 Nm 390 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.9 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 249 km/h 155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | 1,682 kg 3,708 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.1 L/100 km 25.8 mpg US 31.0 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 637 km 396 mi | 492 km 306 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 206 g/km | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 408 L 14.4 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 262 hp/t 195 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 268 hp/t 200 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5) 2.9 TFSI V6 | Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 15.92 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 25.63 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,365 L361 US gal300 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,389 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI RS5 Sportback (F5) 2.9 TFSI V6
- Has 71 Nm more
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 145 km (90 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Ford Mustang VI Facelift 2017 GT/CS 5.0 V8
- Is 38 kg lighter
- Has 6 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























