Car comparison

Ford Kuga II · Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoostvsLexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Kuga II · Facelift 2016

2.0 EcoBoost

242 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018
VS

Lexus NX I (AZ10)

200t

238 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2015-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.3 s
  • Lightest
    1,685 kg
    3,715 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    10.3 L/100 km
    22.8 mpg US
    27.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    178 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    779 km
    484 mi
  • Largest trunk
    555 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    86/100
  • Best practicality score
    86/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
242hp180kW
238hp177kW
Torque
394Nm291lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,702kg3,752lb
1,685kg3,715lb
Gross weight
2,250kg4,960lb
2,295kg5,060lb
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
88.0s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
71.3s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.8s
7.3s
0-200 km/h
50.8s
Calculated
44.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.3s
Calculated
6.9s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.4s
Calculated
15.3s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
141hp/t105kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
690km429mi
Calculated
779km484mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,998cc122cu in
Length
4,531mm178in
4,630mm182in
Width
1,838mm72in
1,845mm73in
Height
1,703mm67in
1,645mm65in
Wheelbase
2,690mm106in
2,660mm105in
Front track
1,573mm62in
1,580mm62in
Rear track
1,583mm62in
1,580mm62in
Ground clearance-
185mm7in
Trunk volume
456L
555L
Max trunk volume
1,653L
1,600L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
60L
CO2 emissions
199g/km
178g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoostLexus NX I (AZ10) 200tPowerTorque
  • Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost5,000 rpm2,500 rpm5,250 rpm
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t4,800 rpm1,650 rpm5,700 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.3 s
6.9 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.8 s
7.3 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.8 s
44.1 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.5 s
330 ft
101 m
7.1 s
6.6 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.7 s
9.9 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.8 s
12.9 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.4 s
15.3 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
87 mph
148 km/h
92 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
242 hp
180 kW
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
238 hp
177 kW

Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost has 4 hp more than Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t.

The biggest power difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 4 hp (3 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
394 Nm
291 lb-ft
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
1,702 kg
3,752 lb
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
1,685 kg
3,715 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
212 km/h
132 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost8.8 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t7.3 s

Although Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost has more power, Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.0 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
690 km
429 mi
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
779 km
484 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
242 hp
180 kW
8.8 s
212 km/h
132 mph
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
238 hp
177 kW
7.3 s
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,531 mm
178.4 in
Height
1,703 mm
67.0 in
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,630 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
238 hp
177 kW
0-100 km/h7.3 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.8 s
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
7.3 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
LexusNX I (AZ10)200t
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostLexusNX I (AZ10)200t
Power
242 hp
180 kW
238 hp
177 kW
Torque
394 Nm
291 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.8 s
7.3 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Unrestricted
210 km/h130 mph
Restricted
200 km/h124 mph
Lightness
1,702 kg
3,752 lb
1,685 kg
3,715 lb
Fuel consumption
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
7.7 L/100 km
30.5 mpg US
36.7 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,531 mm
178.4 in
Height
1,703 mm
67.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Length
4,630 mm
182.3 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
Range score
690 km
429 mi
779 km
484 mi
CO2 score
199 g/km
178 g/km
Trunk score
456 L
16.1 cu ft
555 L
19.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
141 hp/t
105 kW/t
7.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoostLexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Consumption8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK7.7 L/100 km30.5 mpg US36.7 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km15.22 LC100 km13.48 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi24.50 LC100 mi21.69 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal1,155 L305 US gal254 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,284 LC/year2,021 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 4 hp more
  • Has 44 Nm more
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t

  • Is 17 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 90 km (56 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 99 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 21 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Kuga II 2.0 EcoBoost
Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
200t
300
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusNX I (AZ10)Facelift 2017300
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0d
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
200t
350h
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusNX II (AZ20)350h
2.0 EcoBoost
Sport 2.0 T
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
200t
450d V8
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsLexusLX IIIFacelift 2015450d V8
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 T5
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
200t
2.0
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 EcoBoost
3.3 MPi
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
2.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
200t
2.0 TFSI
VS
LexusNX I (AZ10)200tvsAUDIQ5 I (8R)Facelift 20122.0 TFSI
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 T5
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Ford Kuga II · Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost vs Lexus NX I (AZ10) 200t - car comparison - FastVsFaster