Car comparison

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0tvsFord Kuga II · Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-Pace

2.0t

250 hp1997 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTwin-turboSUV2017-2018
VS

Ford Kuga II · Facelift 2016

2.0 EcoBoost

242 hp1999 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2017-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    6.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    217 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    250 hp
    186 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    146 hp/t
    109 kW/t
    6.8 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    7.4 L/100 km
    31.8 mpg US
    38.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    170 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    851 km
    529 mi
  • Largest trunk
    650 L
  • Best overall score
    66/100
  • Best performance score
    54/100
  • Best economy score
    87/100
  • Best practicality score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-Pace2.0tFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
250hp186kW
242hp180kW
Torque
365Nm269lb-ft
394Nm291lb-ft
Curb weight
1,710kg3,770lb
1,702kg3,752lb
Gross weight-
2,250kg4,960lb
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
74.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
88.0s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
6.8s
8.8s
0-200 km/h
36.8s
Calculated
50.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
6.4s
Calculated
8.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
8.7L/100 km27mpg US32.5mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
14.9s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
142hp/t106kW/t64hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton
Calculated
231Nm/t155lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
851km529mi
Calculated
690km429mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,999cc122cu in
Length
4,746mm187in
4,531mm178in
Width
2,070mm81in
1,838mm72in
Height
1,667mm66in
1,703mm67in
Wheelbase
2,874mm113in
2,690mm106in
Front track
1,641mm65in
1,573mm62in
Rear track
1,654mm65in
1,583mm62in
Ground clearance
213mm8in
-
Trunk volume
650L
456L
Max trunk volume-
1,653L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
63L
60L
CO2 emissions
170g/km
199g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0tFord Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
  • Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-Pace2.0t5,500 rpm1,200-4,500 rpm5,750 rpm
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost5,000 rpm2,500 rpm5,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-Pace2.0tFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
6.4 s
8.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
6.8 s
8.8 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.8 s
50.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.4 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.4 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
9.7 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
12.5 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
14.9 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
151 km/h
94 mph
141 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
250 hp
186 kW
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
242 hp
180 kW

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t has 8 hp more than Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 8 hp (6 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
394 Nm
291 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
1,702 kg
3,752 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
217 km/h
135 mph
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t6.8 s
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost8.8 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 2.0 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.3 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
851 km
529 mi
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
690 km
429 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
250 hp
186 kW
6.8 s
217 km/h
135 mph
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
242 hp
180 kW
8.8 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,531 mm
178.4 in
Height
1,703 mm
67.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
Power
250 hp
186 kW
0-100 km/h6.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
242 hp
180 kW
0-100 km/h8.8 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
6.8 s
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
8.8 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-Pace2.0t
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-Pace2.0tFordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoost
Power
250 hp
186 kW
242 hp
180 kW
Torque
365 Nm
269 lb-ft
394 Nm
291 lb-ft
Acceleration
6.8 s
8.8 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,710 kg
3,770 lb
1,702 kg
3,752 lb
Fuel consumption
7.4 L/100 km
31.8 mpg US
38.2 mpg UK
8.7 L/100 km
27.0 mpg US
32.5 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
650 L
23.0 cu ft
Length
4,746 mm
186.9 in
Height
1,667 mm
65.6 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Length
4,531 mm
178.4 in
Height
1,703 mm
67.0 in
Range score
851 km
529 mi
690 km
429 mi
CO2 score
170 g/km
199 g/km
Trunk score
650 L
23.0 cu ft
456 L
16.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
146 hp/t
109 kW/t
6.8 kg/hp
142 hp/t
106 kW/t
7.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-Pace 2.0tFord Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost
Consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK8.7 L/100 km27 mpg US32.5 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km12.95 LC100 km15.22 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi20.84 LC100 mi24.50 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal1,305 L345 US gal287 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,943 LC/year2,284 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t

  • Has 8 hp more
  • Is 2.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.3 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 162 km (100 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 194 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 29 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford Kuga II Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Has 29 Nm more
  • Is 8 kg lighter

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Ford Kuga II 2.0 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0t
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarF-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsFordEvos2.0 EcoBoost
2.0t
2.0 P250
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarE-Pace2.0 P250
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0d
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsJaguarF-Pace2.0d
2.0t
2.0i
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsJaguarE-PaceFacelift 20202.0i
2.0 EcoBoost
Sport 2.0 T
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsSubaruForester IVFacelift 2016Sport 2.0 T
2.0t
2.0 T5
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsVolvoXC60 II2.0 T5
2.0t
2.0
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsPorscheMacan I (95B)2.0
2.0 EcoBoost
3.3 MPi
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsHyundaiSanta Fe III (DM)Facelift 20153.3 MPi
2.0t
2.0 TFSI
VS
JaguarF-Pace2.0tvsAUDIQ5 II (FY)2.0 TFSI
2.0 EcoBoost
ST 1.5 EcoBoost
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsFordPumaST 1.5 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 T5
VS
FordKuga IIFacelift 20162.0 EcoBoostvsVolvoXC90 II2.0 T5
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t vs Ford Kuga II · Facelift 2016 2.0 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster