Porsche Macan I (95B)
Car comparison
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0vsJaguar F-Pace 2.0t
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar F-Pace
2.0t
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.7 s
- Fastest top speed229 km/h142 mph
- Most powerful252 hp188 kW
- Highest torque370 Nm273 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range878 km546 mi
- Best performance score55/100
- Best economy score87/100
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Lightest1,710 kg3,770 lb
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.8 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions170 g/km
- Largest trunk650 L
- Best overall score66/100
- Best practicality score90/100
Specification comparison
| Model | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 252hp188kW | 250hp186kW |
| Torque | 370Nm273lb-ft | 365Nm269lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,770kg3,902lb | 1,710kg3,770lb |
| Gross weight | 2,445kg5,390lb | - |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 80.4s99% target: 227 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 74.6s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.7s | 6.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 30.9s Calculated | 36.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.3s Calculated | 6.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.8s Calculated | 14.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 142hp/t106kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 209Nm/t140lb-ft/ton Calculated | 213Nm/t143lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 878km546mi Calculated | 851km529mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,984cc121cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,697mm185in | 4,746mm187in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 2,070mm81in |
| Height | 1,624mm64in | 1,667mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,807mm111in | 2,874mm113in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | 1,641mm65in |
| Rear track | 1,651mm65in | 1,654mm65in |
| Ground clearance | 185mm7in | 213mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 500L | 650L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,500L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 65L | 63L |
| CO2 emissions | 172g/km | 170g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: Power / Torque
- Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 5,000-6,800 rpm | 1,600-4,500 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 5,500 rpm | 1,200-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.3 s | 6.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.7 s | 6.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 30.9 s | 36.8 s |
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.4 s | 6.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.4 s | 12.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.8 s | 14.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 154 km/h 96 mph | 151 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 250 hp 186 kW |
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 has 2 hp more than Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t and Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0: 2 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 6.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 6.8 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 and Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 878 km 546 mi |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 851 km 529 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 252 hp 188 kW | 6.7 s | 229 km/h 142 mph |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 250 hp 186 kW | 6.8 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t |
| 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.7 s |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 6.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarF-Pace2.0t | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | PorscheMacan I (95B)2.0 | JaguarF-Pace2.0t | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 252 hp 188 kW | 250 hp 186 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 370 Nm 273 lb-ft | 365 Nm 269 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.7 s | 6.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 229 km/h 142 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,770 kg 3,902 lb | 1,710 kg 3,770 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km 31.8 mpg US 38.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 878 km 546 mi | 851 km 529 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 172 g/km | 170 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 500 L 17.7 cu ft | 650 L 23.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 142 hp/t 106 kW/t 7.0 kg/hp | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0 | Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK | 7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 12.95 LC100 km | 12.95 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi | 20.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal | 1,110 L293 US gal244 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,943 LC/year | 1,943 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Porsche Macan I (95B) 2.0
- Has 2 hp more
- Has 5 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 27 km (17 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Jaguar F-Pace 2.0t
- Is 60 kg lighter
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 150 L more trunk volume
- Emits 2 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























