Car comparison

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48VvsFord GT 5.4 i V8 32V

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640

6.5 V12 48V

640 hp6496 ccGasolineAWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe2005-2010
VS
557 hp5409 ccGasolineRWDManualSuperchargedCoupe2005-2006

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    338 km/h
    210 mph
  • Most powerful
    640 hp
    477 kW
  • Best power-to-weight
    350 hp/t
    261 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Largest trunk
    140 L
  • Best overall score
    72/100
  • Best economy score
    50/100
  • Best practicality score
    31/100

Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V

  • Highest torque
    678 Nm
    500 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,610 kg
    3,549 lb
  • Lowest city consumption
    18.1 L/100 km
    13.0 mpg US
    15.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    11.2 L/100 km
    21.0 mpg US
    25.2 mpg UK
  • Best performance score
    92/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelLamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48VFordGT5.4 i V8 32V
Power
640hp477kW
557hp415kW
Torque
660Nm487lb-ft
678Nm500lb-ft
Curb weight
1,830kg4,034lb
1,610kg3,549lb
Gross weight
2,015kg4,442lb
-
Top speed
338 km/h
210 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
To 99% top speed
53.3s99% target: 335 km/h / 208 mph
Calculated
52.5s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
3.6s
0-200 km/h
9.3s
Calculated
9.8s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
21.3L/100 km11mpg US13.3mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption city
32.3L/100 km7.3mpg US8.7mpg UK
18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
15L/100 km15.7mpg US18.8mpg UK
11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
11.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
350hp/t261kW/t159hp/1000 lb
Calculated
346hp/t258kW/t157hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
361Nm/t241lb-ft/ton
Calculated
421Nm/t282lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
469km292mi
Calculated
-
Displacement
6,496cc396cu in
5,409cc330cu in
Length
4,610mm181in
4,645mm183in
Width
2,058mm81in
1,955mm77in
Height
1,135mm45in
1,125mm44in
Wheelbase
2,665mm105in
2,710mm107in
Front track
1,635mm64in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,695mm67in
1,620mm64in
Trunk volume
140L
46L
Max trunk volume
140L
-
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
100L
66L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48VFord GT 5.4 i V8 32VPowerTorque
  • Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V: Power / Torque
  • Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V8,000 rpm-8,250 rpm
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V6,500 rpm3,750 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricLamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48VFordGT5.4 i V8 32V
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
3.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.3 s
9.8 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
34.2 s
41.8 s
Top speed
338 km/h
210 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
1.9 s
2.0 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
5.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
7.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
9.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
11.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
219 km/h
136 mph
216 km/h
134 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V
640 hp
477 kW
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V
557 hp
415 kW

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V has 83 hp more than Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V.

The biggest power difference is between Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V and Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V: 83 hp (62 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V
678 Nm
500 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V
1,610 kg
3,549 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V
338 km/h
210 mph
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V
330 km/h
205 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V3.4 s
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V3.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V and Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V: 0.2 s.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V
350 hp/t
261 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V
346 hp/t
258 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V
640 hp
477 kW
3.4 s
338 km/h
210 mph
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V
557 hp
415 kW
3.6 s
330 km/h
205 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
LamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48V
Power
640 hp
477 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
338 km/h
210 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
140 L
4.9 cu ft
Length
4,610 mm
181.5 in
Height
1,135 mm
44.7 in
FordGT5.4 i V8 32V
Power
557 hp
415 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
330 km/h
205 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
46 L
1.6 cu ft
Length
4,645 mm
182.9 in
Height
1,125 mm
44.3 in

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleLamborghiniMurcielago LP6406.5 V12 48VFordGT5.4 i V8 32V
Power
640 hp
477 kW
557 hp
415 kW
Torque
660 Nm
487 lb-ft
678 Nm
500 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
3.6 s
Top speed
338 km/h
210 mph
330 km/h
205 mph
Lightness
1,830 kg
4,034 lb
1,610 kg
3,549 lb
Fuel consumption
21.3 L/100 km
11.0 mpg US
13.3 mpg UK
-
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
140 L
4.9 cu ft
Length
4,610 mm
181.5 in
Height
1,135 mm
44.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
46 L
1.6 cu ft
Length
4,645 mm
182.9 in
Height
1,125 mm
44.3 in
Range score
469 km
292 mi
-
Trunk score
140 L
4.9 cu ft
46 L
1.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
350 hp/t
261 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
346 hp/t
258 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleLamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V
Consumption21.3 L/100 km11 mpg US13.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km37.29 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi60.02 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used3,197 L844 US gal703 UK gal
Annual fuel cost5,594 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V

  • Has 83 hp more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 94 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V

  • Has 18 Nm more
  • Is 220 kg lighter

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Lamborghini Murcielago LP640 6.5 V12 48V vs Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V - car comparison - FastVsFaster