Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 KompressorvsFord GT 5.4 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord GT
5.4 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor
- Fastest top speed334 km/h208 mph
- Most powerful626 hp467 kW
- Highest torque780 Nm575 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight370 hp/t276 kW/t2.7 kg/hp
- Lowest highway consumption10.8 L/100 km21.8 mpg US26.2 mpg UK
- Largest trunk272 L
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score92/100
- Best economy score68/100
- Best practicality score37/100
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Lightest1,610 kg3,549 lb
- Lowest city consumption18.1 L/100 km13.0 mpg US15.6 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 626hp467kW | 557hp415kW |
| Torque | 780Nm575lb-ft | 678Nm500lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,693kg3,732lb | 1,610kg3,549lb |
| Gross weight | 1,940kg4,277lb | - |
| Top speed | 334 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 61.6s99% target: 331 km/h / 205 mph Calculated | 52.1s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.6s | 9.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 14.5L/100 km16.2mpg US19.5mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption city | 20.9L/100 km11.3mpg US13.5mpg UK | 18.1L/100 km13mpg US15.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10.8L/100 km21.8mpg US26.2mpg UK | 11.2L/100 km21mpg US25.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.5s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 370hp/t276kW/t168hp/1000 lb Calculated | 346hp/t258kW/t157hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 461Nm/t308lb-ft/ton Calculated | 421Nm/t282lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 669km416mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 5,439cc332cu in | 5,409cc330cu in |
| Length | 4,656mm183in | 4,645mm183in |
| Width | 1,908mm75in | 1,955mm77in |
| Height | 1,261mm50in | 1,125mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,700mm106in | 2,710mm107in |
| Front track | 1,638mm64in | 1,600mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,620mm64in |
| Trunk volume | 272L | 46L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 97L | 66L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor: Power / Torque
- Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 6,500 rpm | 3,250-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 6,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.6 s | 9.7 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 43.1 s | 41.5 s |
| Top speed | 334 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.5 s | 11.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 209 km/h 130 mph | 216 km/h 134 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 626 hp 467 kW |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 557 hp 415 kW |
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor has 69 hp more than Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V.
The biggest power difference is between Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor: 69 hp (51 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 780 Nm 575 lb-ft |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 1,693 kg 3,732 lb |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 334 km/h 208 mph |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 330 km/h 205 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 3.8 s |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 3.6 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor has more power, Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V and Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor: 0.2 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 370 hp/t 276 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 346 hp/t 258 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | 626 hp 467 kW | 3.8 s | 334 km/h 208 mph |
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | 557 hp 415 kW | 3.6 s | 330 km/h 205 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordGT5.4 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzSLR McLaren (C199)5.5 V8 Kompressor | FordGT5.4 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 626 hp 467 kW | 557 hp 415 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 780 Nm 575 lb-ft | 678 Nm 500 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 334 km/h 208 mph | 330 km/h 205 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,693 kg 3,732 lb | 1,610 kg 3,549 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 14.5 L/100 km 16.2 mpg US 19.5 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 669 km 416 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 272 L 9.6 cu ft | 46 L 1.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 370 hp/t 276 kW/t 2.7 kg/hp | 346 hp/t 258 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 14.5 L/100 km16.2 mpg US19.5 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 25.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 40.84 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,175 L575 US gal478 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,806 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz SLR McLaren (C199) 5.5 V8 Kompressor
- Has 69 hp more
- Has 102 Nm more
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 226 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Ford GT 5.4 i V8 32V
- Is 83 kg lighter
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























