Ford Galaxy III
Car comparison
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCivsVolkswagen Touran II 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touran II
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.9 s
- Fastest top speed214 km/h133 mph
- Most powerful210 hp157 kW
- Highest torque450 Nm332 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight123 hp/t92 kW/t8.1 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.1 L/100 km46.1 mpg US55.4 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,273 km791 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score48/100
- Best economy score92/100
Volkswagen Touran II 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,379 kg3,040 lb
- Lowest CO2 emissions135 g/km
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best practicality score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 210hp157kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 450Nm332lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,704kg3,757lb | 1,379kg3,040lb |
| Gross weight | 2,620kg5,776lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.2s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 92.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.9s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 53.4s Calculated | 58.6s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.4s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.8L/100 km40.6mpg US48.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK | 5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.4s Calculated | 16.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated | 109hp/t81kW/t49hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 181Nm/t121lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,273km791mi Calculated | 1,000km621mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,395cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,848mm191in | 4,527mm178in |
| Width | 1,916mm75in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,747mm69in | 1,659mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,849mm112in | 2,791mm110in |
| Front track | 1,606mm63in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | 124mm5in | 156mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 300L | 834L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,339L | 1,980L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 135g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touran II 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 3,750 rpm | 2,000-2,250 rpm | 4,000 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 5,000-6,000 rpm | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.4 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.9 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 53.4 s | 58.6 s |
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.7 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.8 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.4 s | 16.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 138 km/h 86 mph | 139 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW |
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi has 60 hp more than Volkswagen Touran II 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.4 TSI and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 60 hp (45 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 8.9 s |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 8.9 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 1,273 km 791 mi |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 1,000 km 621 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 210 hp 157 kW | 8.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI |
| 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran II1.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 210 hp 157 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.9 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 214 km/h 133 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,704 kg 3,757 lb | 1,379 kg 3,040 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km 40.6 mpg US 48.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,273 km 791 mi | 1,000 km 621 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 135 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 123 hp/t 92 kW/t 8.1 kg/hp | 109 hp/t 81 kW/t 9.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi | Volkswagen Touran II 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.8 L/100 km40.6 mpg US48.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 10.15 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 16.33 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 870 L230 US gal191 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,523 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
- Has 60 hp more
- Has 200 Nm more
- Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.3 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 273 km (169 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Volkswagen Touran II 1.4 TSI
- Is 325 kg lighter
- Has 534 L more trunk volume
- Emits 9 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























