Car comparison

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 EcoBoost

240 hp1999 ccGasolineFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018
VS

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Highest torque
    500 Nm
    369 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.2 L/100 km
    32.7 mpg US
    39.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    162 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,111 km
    690 mi
  • Largest trunk
    700 L
  • Best overall score
    65/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.6 s
  • Fastest top speed
    222 km/h
    138 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Lightest
    1,658 kg
    3,655 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    145 hp/t
    108 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240hp179kW
240hp179kW
Torque
345Nm254lb-ft
500Nm369lb-ft
Curb weight
1,658kg3,655lb
1,766kg3,893lb
Gross weight
2,585kg5,699lb
2,575kg5,677lb
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
99.4s99% target: 220 km/h / 137 mph
Calculated
96.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.6s
8.6s
0-200 km/h
43.5s
Calculated
46.2s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.1s
Calculated
8.1s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
7.9L/100 km29.8mpg US35.8mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.5L/100 km36.2mpg US43.5mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb
Calculated
136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
208Nm/t139lb-ft/ton
Calculated
283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
886km551mi
Calculated
1,111km690mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,999cc122cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,848mm191in
4,796mm189in
Width
1,916mm75in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,747mm69in
1,655mm65in
Wheelbase
2,849mm112in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,606mm63in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance
124mm5in
150mm6in
Trunk volume
300L
700L
Max trunk volume
2,339L
2,200L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
70L
70L
CO2 emissions
180g/km
162g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluePowerTorque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost5,400 rpm2,300-4,900 rpm5,650 rpm
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue4,000 rpm2,000 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.1 s
8.1 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.6 s
8.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
43.5 s
46.2 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.7 s
13.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
142 km/h
88 mph
141 km/h
88 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
500 Nm
369 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,766 kg
3,893 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
222 km/h
138 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
218 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost8.6 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue8.6 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost: 1.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
886 km
551 mi
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
1,111 km
690 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
222 km/h
138 mph
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
240 hp
179 kW
8.6 s
218 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h8.6 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
8.6 s
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
8.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoost
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostFordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Power
240 hp
179 kW
240 hp
179 kW
Torque
345 Nm
254 lb-ft
500 Nm
369 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.6 s
8.6 s
Top speed
222 km/h
138 mph
218 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,658 kg
3,655 lb
1,766 kg
3,893 lb
Fuel consumption
7.9 L/100 km
29.8 mpg US
35.8 mpg UK
6.3 L/100 km
37.3 mpg US
44.8 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Length
4,796 mm
188.8 in
Height
1,655 mm
65.2 in
Range score
886 km
551 mi
1,111 km
690 mi
CO2 score
180 g/km
162 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
700 L
24.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
145 hp/t
108 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
136 hp/t
101 kW/t
7.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoostFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Consumption7.9 L/100 km29.8 mpg US35.8 mpg UK6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km13.83 LC100 km11.03 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi22.25 LC100 mi17.74 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,185 L313 US gal261 UK gal945 L250 US gal208 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,074 LC/year1,654 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost

  • Is 108 kg lighter
  • Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue

  • Has 155 Nm more
  • Uses 1.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 225 km (140 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 400 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 18 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsFordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBlue Bi-Turbo
2.0 EcoBoost
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
2.0 EcoBoost
225i
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)225i
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
2.0 TDI SCR
VS
FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo EcobluevsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR
2.0 EcoBoost
220i
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220i
2.0 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 EcoBoost vs Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue - car comparison - FastVsFaster