Volkswagen Touran II
Car comparison
Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCRvsFord S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord S-MAX II
2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Fastest top speed220 km/h137 mph
- Lightest1,645 kg3,627 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Lowest CO2 emissions125 g/km
- Best estimated range1,208 km751 mi
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best economy score94/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque500 Nm369 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight136 hp/t101 kW/t7.4 kg/hp
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 240hp179kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 500Nm369lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,645kg3,627lb | 1,766kg3,893lb |
| Gross weight | 2,240kg4,938lb | 2,575kg5,677lb |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.3s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 96.4s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 8.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 43.0s Calculated | 46.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.7s Calculated | 8.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK | 7.2L/100 km32.7mpg US39.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 116hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 136hp/t101kW/t62hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 243Nm/t163lb-ft/ton Calculated | 283Nm/t189lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,208km751mi Calculated | 1,111km690mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,968cc120cu in | 1,997cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,527mm178in | 4,796mm189in |
| Width | 1,829mm72in | 1,916mm75in |
| Height | 1,674mm66in | 1,655mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,786mm110in | 2,849mm112in |
| Front track | 1,569mm62in | 1,606mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,542mm61in | 1,606mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 156mm6in | 150mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 834L | 700L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,980L | 2,200L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 70L |
| CO2 emissions | 125g/km | 162g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR: Power / Torque
- Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | - | 1,900-3,300 rpm | 3,550 rpm |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 4,000 rpm | 2,000 rpm | 4,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.7 s | 8.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 8.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 43.0 s | 46.2 s |
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.9 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.4 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.4 s | 13.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 141 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 190 hp 142 kW |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 240 hp 179 kW |
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue has 50 hp more than Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 218 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 8.2 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 8.6 s |
Although Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue has more power, Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR and Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue: 1.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 1,208 km 751 mi |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 1,111 km 690 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 190 hp 142 kW | 8.2 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 240 hp 179 kW | 8.6 s | 218 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
| 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | 8.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI SCR | FordS-MAX II2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 240 hp 179 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 500 Nm 369 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 8.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 220 km/h 137 mph | 218 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,645 kg 3,627 lb | 1,766 kg 3,893 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km 37.3 mpg US 44.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,208 km 751 mi | 1,111 km 690 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 125 g/km | 162 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | 700 L 24.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 116 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 136 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR | Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 6.3 L/100 km37.3 mpg US44.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 11.03 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 17.74 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 945 L250 US gal208 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,654 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Volkswagen Touran II 2.0 TDI SCR
- Is 121 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 1.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 97 km (60 mi) more estimated range
- Has 134 L more trunk volume
- Emits 37 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
Ford S-MAX II 2.0 Bi-Turbo Ecoblue
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 100 Nm more
- Has 20 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























