Ford Explorer VI
Car comparison
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6vsHongqi EHS7 85 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi EHS7
85 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful349 hp260 kW
- Highest torque555 Nm409 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight146 hp/t109 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score69/100
- Best performance score64/100
- Best economy score99/100
Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh
- Lightest2,369 kg5,223 lb
- Largest trunk456 L
- Best practicality score83/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 349hp260kW | 344hp257kW |
| Torque | 555Nm409lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,391kg5,271lb | 2,369kg5,223lb |
| Gross weight | 3,160kg6,967lb | 2,819kg6,215lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 80.7s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 25.7s Calculated | 41.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 2.9L/100 km81.1mpg US97.4mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 14.2s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 146hp/t109kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 232Nm/t155lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 2,476km1,538mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 2,956cc180cu in | - |
| Length | 5,049mm199in | 4,925mm194in |
| Width | 2,004mm79in | 1,950mm77in |
| Height | 1,778mm70in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 3,025mm119in | 3,000mm118in |
| Ground clearance | 204mm8in | - |
| Trunk volume | 330L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,274L | 1,709L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 72L | - |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 25.7 s | 41.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.9 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.2 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 160 km/h 99 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 344 hp 257 kW |
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 has 5 hp more than Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh and Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 2,369 kg 5,223 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 6.0 s |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 6.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 and Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | 349 hp 260 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 344 hp 257 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordExplorer VI3.0 EcoBoost V6 | HongqiEHS785 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 349 hp 260 kW | 344 hp 257 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 555 Nm 409 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,391 kg 5,271 lb | 2,369 kg 5,223 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 2.9 L/100 km 81.1 mpg US 97.4 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 2,476 km 1,538 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 330 L 11.7 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 146 hp/t 109 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 2.9 L/100 km81.1 mpg US97.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 5.08 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 8.17 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 435 L115 US gal96 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 761.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford Explorer VI 3.0 EcoBoost V6
- Has 5 hp more
- Has 105 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 30 km/h (19 mph) higher top speed
- Has 1 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh
- Is 22 kg lighter
- Has 126 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























