AUDI Q8 e-tron
Car comparison
AUDI Q8 e-tron 50 95 kWhvsHongqi EHS7 85 kWh
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonHongqi EHS7
85 kWh
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI Q8 e-tron 50 95 kWh
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.0 s
- Fastest top speed210 km/h130 mph Unrestricted200 km/h124 mph Restricted
- Highest torque664 Nm490 lb-ft
- Largest trunk569 L
- Best overall score71/100
- Best performance score63/100
- Best economy score0/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh
- Most powerful344 hp257 kW
- Lightest2,369 kg5,223 lb
- Best power-to-weight145 hp/t108 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 340hp254kW | 344hp257kW |
| Torque | 664Nm490lb-ft | 450Nm332lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,510kg5,534lb | 2,369kg5,223lb |
| Gross weight | 3,170kg6,989lb | 2,819kg6,215lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 60.2s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated | 67.1s99% target: 208 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.0s | 6.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.1s Calculated | 41.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.7s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Quarter mile | 14.3s Calculated | 14.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 135hp/t101kW/t61hp/1000 lb Calculated | 145hp/t108kW/t66hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 265Nm/t177lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Length | 4,915mm194in | 4,925mm194in |
| Width | 1,937mm76in | 1,950mm77in |
| Height | 1,633mm64in | 1,680mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,928mm115in | 3,000mm118in |
| Front track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Rear track | 1,655mm65in | - |
| Trunk volume | 569L | 456L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,637L | 1,709L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.7 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.0 s | 6.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.1 s | 41.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.1 s | 6.2 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.2 s | 9.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.0 s | 12.3 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.3 s | 14.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 156 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 94 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 344 hp 257 kW |
Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh has 4 hp more than AUDI Q8 e-tron 50 95 kWh.
The biggest power difference is between AUDI Q8 e-tron 50 95 kWh and Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh: 4 hp (3 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | 664 Nm 490 lb-ft |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 2,369 kg 5,223 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | 6.0 s |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 6.5 s |
Although Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh has more power, AUDI Q8 e-tron 50 95 kWh is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between AUDI Q8 e-tron 50 95 kWh and Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh: 0.5 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | 340 hp 254 kW | 6.0 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
| HongqiEHS785 kWh | 344 hp 257 kW | 6.5 s | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| HongqiEHS785 kWh |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | AUDIQ8 e-tron50 95 kWh | HongqiEHS785 kWh | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 340 hp 254 kW | 344 hp 257 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 664 Nm 490 lb-ft | 450 Nm 332 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.0 s | 6.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | Unrestricted 210 km/h130 mph Restricted 200 km/h124 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,510 kg 5,534 lb | 2,369 kg 5,223 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 569 L 20.1 cu ft | 456 L 16.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 135 hp/t 101 kW/t 7.4 kg/hp | 145 hp/t 108 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Head-to-head comparisons
AUDI Q8 e-tron 50 95 kWh
- Has 214 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 113 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Hongqi EHS7 85 kWh
- Has 4 hp more
- Is 141 kg lighter
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























