Car comparison

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCivsVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDCi

170 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2019
VS

Volkswagen Touran II

1.5 TSI ACT

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2020-2026

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    212 km/h
    132 mph
  • Most powerful
    170 hp
    127 kW
  • Highest torque
    400 Nm
    295 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    118 hp/t
    88 kW/t
    8.5 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    4.8 L/100 km
    49.0 mpg US
    58.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.4 L/100 km
    53.5 mpg US
    64.2 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,250 km
    777 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best performance score
    47/100
  • Best economy score
    94/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Power
170hp127kW
150hp112kW
Torque
400Nm295lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,444kg3,183lb
1,440kg3,175lb
Gross weight
2,050kg4,519lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
88.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
93.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
50.5s
Calculated
59.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK
5.4L/100 km43.6mpg US52.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
6L/100 km39.2mpg US47.1mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb
Calculated
104hp/t78kW/t47hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton
Calculated
174Nm/t116lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,250km777mi
Calculated
1,074km667mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,997cc122cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,379mm172in
4,527mm178in
Width
1,828mm72in
1,829mm72in
Height
1,610mm63in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,648mm104in
2,786mm110in
Front track
1,557mm61in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,569mm62in
1,542mm61in
Ground clearance-
156mm6in
Trunk volume
432L
834L
Max trunk volume
1,684L
1,980L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
58L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACTPowerTorque
  • Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi3,500 rpm2,000-2,500 rpm3,750 rpm
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT-1,500-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
50.5 s
59.1 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.6 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.1 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
150 hp
112 kW

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 20 hp (15 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
1,440 kg
3,175 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
212 km/h
132 mph
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
209 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi8.5 s
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: 0.6 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1,250 km
777 mi
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
1,074 km
667 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
150 hp
112 kW
8.9 s
209 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
834 L
29.5 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
8.5 s
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCiVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Power
170 hp
127 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
400 Nm
295 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.9 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,444 kg
3,183 lb
1,440 kg
3,175 lb
Fuel consumption
4.8 L/100 km
49.0 mpg US
58.9 mpg UK
5.4 L/100 km
43.6 mpg US
52.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,379 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,610 mm
63.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
834 L
29.5 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
1,250 km
777 mi
1,074 km
667 mi
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
834 L
29.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
118 hp/t
88 kW/t
8.5 kg/hp
104 hp/t
78 kW/t
9.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCiVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
Consumption4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK5.4 L/100 km43.6 mpg US52.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km8.40 LC100 km9.45 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi13.52 LC100 mi15.21 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used720 L190 US gal158 UK gal810 L214 US gal178 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,260 LC/year1,418 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 20 hp more
  • Has 150 Nm more
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.6 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 14 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 176 km (109 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk

Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT

  • Is 4 kg lighter
  • Has 402 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford C-MAX II 2.0 TDCi
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1.5 TSI ACT
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1.5 TSI ACT
220d
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)220d
2.0 TDCi
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.0 TDCi
1.8 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCivsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
1.5 TSI ACT
218d
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
1.5 TSI ACT
218d
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi vs Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT - car comparison - FastVsFaster