Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCivsVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touran II
1.5 TSI ACT
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,444 kg3,183 lb
- Best power-to-weight118 hp/t88 kW/t8.5 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best overall score59/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
- Largest trunk834 L
- Best practicality score95/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 150hp112kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,444kg3,183lb | 1,505kg3,318lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,110kg4,652lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 95.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.5s Calculated | 60.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.4s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 1,018km632mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,527mm178in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,829mm72in |
| Height | 1,610mm63in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,648mm104in | 2,786mm110in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,569mm62in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,542mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 156mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 432L | 834L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,684L | 1,980L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 58L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 130g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 3,500 rpm | 2,000-2,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | - | 1,500-3,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.5 s | 60.1 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.7 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.4 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 138 km/h 86 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 170 hp 127 kW |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW |
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi has 20 hp more than Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT and Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 209 km/h 130 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 8.9 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: 0.4 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: 0.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 1,018 km 632 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 150 hp 112 kW | 8.9 s | 209 km/h 130 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 150 hp 112 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 209 km/h 130 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb | 1,505 kg 3,318 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 1,018 km 632 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 130 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | 834 L 29.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 100 hp/t 74 kW/t 10.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi | Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 61 kg lighter
- Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 232 km (144 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
- Has 402 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























