Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015
Car comparison
Ford C-MAX II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCivsVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2006
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.5 s
- Fastest top speed212 km/h132 mph
- Most powerful170 hp127 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption4.8 L/100 km49.0 mpg US58.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption4.4 L/100 km53.5 mpg US64.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,250 km777 mi
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score94/100
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,423 kg3,137 lb
- Best power-to-weight119 hp/t89 kW/t8.4 kg/hp
- Largest trunk667 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best practicality score93/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 170hp127kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,444kg3,183lb | 1,423kg3,137lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated | 93.3s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 50.5s Calculated | 52.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 4.8L/100 km49mpg US58.9mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 4.4L/100 km53.5mpg US64.2mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 118hp/t88kW/t53hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 277Nm/t185lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,250km777mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,997cc122cu in | 1,390cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,379mm172in | 4,391mm173in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,610mm63in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,648mm104in | 2,678mm105in |
| Front track | 1,557mm61in | 1,539mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 432L | 667L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,684L | 1,989L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 3,500 rpm | 2,000-2,500 rpm | 3,750 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 50.5 s | 52.7 s |
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.6 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 141 km/h 88 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 170 hp 127 kW |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 1,423 kg 3,137 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 8.5 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi and Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI: 2.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 1,250 km 777 mi |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi |
| 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 170 hp 127 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 212 km/h 132 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb | 1,423 kg 3,137 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 4.8 L/100 km 49.0 mpg US 58.9 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,250 km 777 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | 667 L 23.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 118 hp/t 88 kW/t 8.5 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi | Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 4.8 L/100 km49 mpg US58.9 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 8.40 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 13.52 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 720 L190 US gal158 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,260 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford C-MAX II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDCi
- Has 160 Nm more
- Uses 2.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 461 km (286 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI
- Is 21 kg lighter
- Has 2 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 235 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























