Ford S-MAX
Car comparison
Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20VvsVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2006
1.4 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.9 s
- Fastest top speed230 km/h143 mph
- Most powerful220 hp164 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight131 hp/t98 kW/t7.6 kg/hp
- Largest trunk854 L
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best practicality score95/100
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI
- Lightest1,423 kg3,137 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption10.3 L/100 km22.8 mpg US27.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range789 km491 mi
- Best economy score86/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 220hp164kW | 170hp127kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,681kg3,706lb | 1,423kg3,137lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 2,090kg4,608lb |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.8s99% target: 228 km/h / 141 mph Calculated | 92.7s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.9s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.5s Calculated | 52.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.5s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.4L/100 km25mpg US30.1mpg UK | 7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.1L/100 km33.1mpg US39.8mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.7s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 131hp/t98kW/t59hp/1000 lb Calculated | 119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated | 169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 745km463mi Calculated | 789km491mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,522cc154cu in | 1,390cc85cu in |
| Length | 4,768mm188in | 4,391mm173in |
| Width | 1,884mm74in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,658mm65in | 1,652mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,850mm112in | 2,678mm105in |
| Front track | 1,589mm63in | 1,539mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,605mm63in | 1,521mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 854L | 667L |
| Max trunk volume | 2,100L | 1,989L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 5,000 rpm | 1,500-4,800 rpm | 5,250 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 6,000 rpm | 1,750 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.5 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.9 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.5 s | 52.4 s |
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.9 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.7 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 145 km/h 90 mph | 140 km/h 87 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 220 hp 164 kW |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW |
Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V has 50 hp more than Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI and Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V: 50 hp (37 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 1,681 kg 3,706 lb |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 1,423 kg 3,137 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 212 km/h 132 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V and Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI and Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V: 1.8 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 745 km 463 mi |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 789 km 491 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 220 hp 164 kW | 7.9 s | 230 km/h 143 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 170 hp 127 kW | 8.5 s | 212 km/h 132 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V |
| 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI |
| 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordS-MAX2.5 i 20V | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 220 hp 164 kW | 170 hp 127 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.9 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 230 km/h 143 mph | 212 km/h 132 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,681 kg 3,706 lb | 1,423 kg 3,137 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.4 L/100 km 25.0 mpg US 30.1 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km 30.9 mpg US 37.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 745 km 463 mi | 789 km 491 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 854 L 30.2 cu ft | 667 L 23.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 131 hp/t 98 kW/t 7.6 kg/hp | 119 hp/t 89 kW/t 8.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V | Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.4 L/100 km25 mpg US30.1 mpg UK | 7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.45 LC100 km | 13.30 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.47 LC100 mi | 21.40 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,410 L372 US gal310 UK gal | 1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,468 LC/year | 1,995 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford S-MAX 2.5 i 20V
- Has 50 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 11 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 187 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI
- Is 258 kg lighter
- Uses 1.8 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 45 km (28 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























