Car comparison

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015
VS

Volkswagen Touran II

1.5 TSI ACT

150 hp1498 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2018-2020

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT

  • Highest torque
    250 Nm
    184 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.7 L/100 km
    41.3 mpg US
    49.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.9 L/100 km
    34.1 mpg US
    40.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    130 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,018 km
    632 mi
  • Largest trunk
    834 L
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    91/100
  • Best practicality score
    95/100

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    217 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    182 hp
    136 kW
  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Best performance score
    45/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Power
182hp136kW
150hp112kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
250Nm184lb-ft
Curb weight
1,310kg2,888lb
1,505kg3,318lb
Gross weight
1,900kg4,189lb
2,110kg4,652lb
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
To 99% top speed
88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
95.5s99% target: 207 km/h / 129 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
44.5s
Calculated
60.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
6.9L/100 km34.1mpg US40.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
100hp/t74kW/t45hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
166Nm/t111lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
887km551mi
Calculated
1,018km632mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,596cc97cu in
1,498cc91cu in
Length
4,380mm172in
4,527mm178in
Width
1,828mm72in
1,829mm72in
Height
1,626mm64in
1,674mm66in
Wheelbase
2,648mm104in
2,786mm110in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,569mm62in
Rear track
1,569mm62in
1,542mm61in
Ground clearance-
156mm6in
Trunk volume
432L
834L
Max trunk volume
1,723L
1,980L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
58L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
130g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACTPowerTorque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT-1,500-3,500 rpm3,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.5 s
60.1 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
150 hp
112 kW

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost has 32 hp more than Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 32 hp (24 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
250 Nm
184 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
1,505 kg
3,318 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
209 km/h
130 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost8.5 s
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.5 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
100 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
1,018 km
632 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
150 hp
112 kW
8.9 s
209 km/h
130 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
834 L
29.5 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Power
150 hp
112 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
209 km/h
130 mph
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
100 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACT
Power
182 hp
136 kW
150 hp
112 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
250 Nm
184 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
209 km/h
130 mph
Lightness
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
1,505 kg
3,318 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.7 L/100 km
41.3 mpg US
49.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
834 L
29.5 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,674 mm
65.9 in
Range score
887 km
551 mi
1,018 km
632 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
130 g/km
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
834 L
29.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
100 hp/t
74 kW/t
10.0 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km9.98 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi16.05 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal855 L226 US gal188 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,496 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Has 32 hp more
  • Is 195 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 8 km/h (5 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT

  • Has 10 Nm more
  • Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 130 km (81 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 402 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 14 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1.5 TSI ACT
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1.5 TSI ACT
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1.5 TSI ACT
218d
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)218d
1.6 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
1.5 TSI ACT
218d
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (U06)218d
1.5 TSI ACT
218d
VS
VolkswagenTouran II1.5 TSI ACTvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)218d
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost vs Volkswagen Touran II 1.5 TSI ACT - car comparison - FastVsFaster