Ford C-MAX II
Car comparison
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2010
2.0 TDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h8.2 s
- Highest torque380 Nm280 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.0 L/100 km33.6 mpg US40.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,053 km654 mi
- Largest trunk695 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best economy score91/100
- Best practicality score94/100
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Fastest top speed217 km/h135 mph
- Most powerful182 hp136 kW
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Best power-to-weight139 hp/t104 kW/t7.2 kg/hp
- Lowest CO2 emissions144 g/km
Specification comparison
| Model | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 182hp136kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 240Nm177lb-ft | 380Nm280lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,310kg2,888lb | 1,598kg3,523lb |
| Gross weight | 1,900kg4,189lb | 2,220kg4,894lb |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 88.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated | 90.2s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.5s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 44.3s Calculated | 48.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 8.0s Calculated | 7.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 5.7L/100 km41.3mpg US49.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 16.2s Calculated | 16.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated | 111hp/t83kW/t50hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 887km551mi Calculated | 1,053km654mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,596cc97cu in | 1,968cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,380mm172in | 4,397mm173in |
| Width | 1,828mm72in | 1,794mm71in |
| Height | 1,626mm64in | 1,674mm66in |
| Wheelbase | 2,648mm104in | 2,678mm105in |
| Front track | 1,559mm61in | 1,541mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,569mm62in | 1,514mm60in |
| Trunk volume | 432L | 695L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,723L | 1,989L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 60L |
| CO2 emissions | 144g/km | 150g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
- Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 4,200 rpm | 1,750-2,500 rpm | 4,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 8.0 s | 7.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.5 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 44.3 s | 48.0 s |
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.6 s | 10.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.6 s | 13.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 16.2 s | 16.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 143 km/h 89 mph | 142 km/h 88 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost has 5 hp more than Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI.
The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 8.2 s |
Although Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost has more power, Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 887 km 551 mi |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 1,053 km 654 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 177 hp 132 kW | 8.2 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI |
| 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 182 hp 136 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | 380 Nm 280 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.5 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 217 km/h 135 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | 1,598 kg 3,523 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km 41.3 mpg US 49.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 887 km 551 mi | 1,053 km 654 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | 144 g/km | 150 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | 695 L 24.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 111 hp/t 83 kW/t 9.0 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost | Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 5.7 L/100 km41.3 mpg US49.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 9.98 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 16.05 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 855 L226 US gal188 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 1,496 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 288 kg lighter
- Has 3 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Emits 6 g/km less CO2
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2010 2.0 TDI
- Has 140 Nm more
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 166 km (103 mi) more estimated range
- Has 263 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Highest CO2 emissions
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























