Car comparison

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015
VS

Volkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2006

1.4 TSI

170 hp1390 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbo + superchargedMinivan / MPV2007-2009

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    217 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    182 hp
    136 kW
  • Highest torque
    240 Nm
    177 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    887 km
    551 mi
  • Best performance score
    45/100
  • Best economy score
    90/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
Power
182hp136kW
170hp127kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,310kg2,888lb
1,423kg3,137lb
Gross weight
1,900kg4,189lb
2,090kg4,608lb
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
To 99% top speed
88.3s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
92.7s99% target: 210 km/h / 130 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
44.3s
Calculated
52.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
10.3L/100 km22.8mpg US27.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
119hp/t89kW/t54hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
169Nm/t113lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
887km551mi
Calculated
789km491mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,596cc97cu in
1,390cc85cu in
Length
4,380mm172in
4,391mm173in
Width
1,828mm72in
1,794mm71in
Height
1,626mm64in
1,652mm65in
Wheelbase
2,648mm104in
2,678mm105in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,539mm61in
Rear track
1,569mm62in
1,521mm60in
Trunk volume
432L
667L
Max trunk volume
1,723L
1,989L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
60L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSIPowerTorque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.3 s
52.4 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
6.9 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
140 km/h
87 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
170 hp
127 kW

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost has 12 hp more than Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 12 hp (9 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
1,423 kg
3,137 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
212 km/h
132 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost8.5 s
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI8.5 s

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI: 1.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
789 km
491 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
170 hp
127 kW
8.5 s
212 km/h
132 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
667 L
23.6 cu ft
Length
4,391 mm
172.9 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
Power
170 hp
127 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
212 km/h
132 mph
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
Power
182 hp
136 kW
170 hp
127 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
212 km/h
132 mph
Lightness
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
1,423 kg
3,137 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
7.6 L/100 km
30.9 mpg US
37.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
667 L
23.6 cu ft
Length
4,391 mm
172.9 in
Height
1,652 mm
65.0 in
Range score
887 km
551 mi
789 km
491 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
-
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
667 L
23.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
119 hp/t
89 kW/t
8.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagen Touran I Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK7.6 L/100 km30.9 mpg US37.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km13.30 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi21.40 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal1,140 L301 US gal251 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,995 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Has 12 hp more
  • Is 113 kg lighter
  • Has 5 km/h (3 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 1.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 19 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 98 km (61 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Touran I 1.4 TSI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1.4 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
1.4 TSI
1.8 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1.4 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1.4 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
1.4 TSI
B 200 Turbo
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSIvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo
1.4 TSI
B 200 Turbo
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSIvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)B 200 Turbo
1.4 TSI
3.5 V6
VS
VolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSIvsRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost vs Volkswagen Touran I · Facelift 2006 1.4 TSI - car comparison - FastVsFaster