Car comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIvsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Volkswagen Sharan II

2.0 TSI

200 hp1984 ccGasolineFWDDual-clutchTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015
VS

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    887 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    432 L
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.3 s
  • Fastest top speed
    218 km/h
    135 mph
  • Most powerful
    200 hp
    149 kW
  • Highest torque
    280 Nm
    207 lb-ft
  • Best overall score
    57/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
200hp149kW
182hp136kW
Torque
280Nm207lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,790kg3,946lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,360kg5,203lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
100.7s99% target: 216 km/h / 134 mph
Calculated
88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.3s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
47.2s
Calculated
44.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.8s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
6.6L/100 km35.6mpg US42.8mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.0s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
112hp/t83kW/t51hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
156Nm/t105lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
833km518mi
Calculated
887km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,984cc121cu in
1,596cc97cu in
Length
4,854mm191in
4,380mm172in
Width
1,904mm75in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,720mm68in
1,626mm64in
Wheelbase
2,919mm115in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,569mm62in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,617mm64in
1,569mm62in
Trunk volume
300L
432L
Max trunk volume
2,297L
1,723L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
70L
55L
CO2 emissions
196g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI5,100 rpm1,700-5,000 rpm5,350 rpm
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.8 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.3 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
47.2 s
44.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.4 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.4 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.0 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
141 km/h
88 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI has 18 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 18 hp (13 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI8.3 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.2 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI: 2.2 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
8.9 kg/hp
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
833 km
518 mi
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
200 hp
149 kW
8.3 s
218 km/h
135 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Power
200 hp
149 kW
0-100 km/h8.3 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
8.3 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
200 hp
149 kW
182 hp
136 kW
Torque
280 Nm
207 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.3 s
8.5 s
Top speed
218 km/h
135 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,790 kg
3,946 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
8.4 L/100 km
28.0 mpg US
33.6 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Range score
833 km
518 mi
887 km
551 mi
CO2 score
196 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
300 L
10.6 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
112 hp/t
83 kW/t
9.0 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleVolkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSIFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Consumption8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km14.70 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi23.66 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,205 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI

  • Has 18 hp more
  • Has 40 Nm more
  • Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Is 480 kg lighter
  • Uses 2.2 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 27 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 54 km (33 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 132 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 52 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TSI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran II2.0 TDI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 TSI
220d
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
2.0 TSI
B 200 Turbo
VS
VolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSIvsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TSI vs Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster