Car comparison

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015
VS

Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015

2.0 TDI

184 hp1968 ccDieselFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI

  • Most powerful
    184 hp
    137 kW
  • Highest torque
    380 Nm
    280 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.7 L/100 km
    35.1 mpg US
    42.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    4.5 L/100 km
    52.3 mpg US
    62.8 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    139 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    1,321 km
    821 mi
  • Largest trunk
    955 L
  • Best overall score
    62/100
  • Best performance score
    46/100
  • Best economy score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    96/100

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.5 s
  • Fastest top speed
    217 km/h
    135 mph
  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    139 hp/t
    104 kW/t
    7.2 kg/hp

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
Power
182hp136kW
184hp137kW
Torque
240Nm177lb-ft
380Nm280lb-ft
Curb weight
1,310kg2,888lb
1,725kg3,803lb
Gross weight
1,900kg4,189lb
2,400kg5,291lb
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
To 99% top speed
88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
104.3s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.5s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
44.5s
Calculated
53.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
4.5L/100 km52.3mpg US62.8mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.2s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
107hp/t80kW/t48hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
220Nm/t147lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
887km551mi
Calculated
1,321km821mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,596cc97cu in
1,968cc120cu in
Length
4,380mm172in
4,854mm191in
Width
1,828mm72in
1,904mm75in
Height
1,626mm64in
1,720mm68in
Wheelbase
2,648mm104in
2,920mm115in
Front track
1,559mm61in
1,571mm62in
Rear track
1,569mm62in
1,617mm64in
Ground clearance-
152mm6in
Trunk volume
432L
955L
Max trunk volume
1,723L
2,430L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
70L
CO2 emissions
144g/km
139g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDIPowerTorque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
  • Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI3,500-4,000 rpm1,750-3,250 rpm4,250 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.5 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
44.5 s
53.1 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.6 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.6 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.2 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
143 km/h
89 mph
138 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI has 2 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: 2 hp (1 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
380 Nm
280 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
1,725 kg
3,803 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
215 km/h
134 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost8.5 s
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI8.9 s

Although Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI has more power, Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI: 0.4 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.9 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
1,321 km
821 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
184 hp
137 kW
8.9 s
215 km/h
134 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
Power
184 hp
137 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
215 km/h
134 mph
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
Power
182 hp
136 kW
184 hp
137 kW
Torque
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
380 Nm
280 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.5 s
8.9 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
215 km/h
134 mph
Lightness
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
1,725 kg
3,803 lb
Fuel consumption
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
5.3 L/100 km
44.4 mpg US
53.3 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Length
4,854 mm
191.1 in
Height
1,720 mm
67.7 in
Range score
887 km
551 mi
1,321 km
821 mi
CO2 score
144 g/km
139 g/km
Trunk score
432 L
15.3 cu ft
955 L
33.7 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
107 hp/t
80 kW/t
9.4 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostVolkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI
Consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.85 LC100 km9.28 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi17.46 LC100 mi14.93 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used930 L246 US gal205 UK gal795 L210 US gal175 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,628 LC/year1,391 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Is 415 kg lighter
  • Is 0.4 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 2 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Volkswagen Sharan II Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI

  • Has 2 hp more
  • Has 140 Nm more
  • Uses 0.9 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 434 km (269 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 523 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 5 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Volkswagen Sharan II 2.0 TDI
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
2.0 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
2.0 TDI
1.8 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTouran II1.8 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20102.0 TDI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDI
220d
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsBMW2 Series Gran Tourer (F46)220d
1.6 EcoBoost
2.5 i 20V
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
2.0 TDI
220d
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsBMW2 Series Active Tourer (F45)220d
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDI
2.0 TDI
1.4 TSI
VS
VolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TDIvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost vs Volkswagen Sharan II · Facelift 2015 2.0 TDI - car comparison - FastVsFaster