Vauxhall Zafira B
Car comparison
Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPCvsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFord C-MAX II
1.6 EcoBoost
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Lightest1,310 kg2,888 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption7.8 L/100 km30.2 mpg US36.2 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.3 L/100 km44.4 mpg US53.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range887 km551 mi
- Largest trunk432 L
- Best economy score90/100
- Best practicality score84/100
Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.8 s
- Fastest top speed231 km/h144 mph
- Most powerful240 hp179 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight144 hp/t107 kW/t6.9 kg/hp
- Best overall score58/100
- Best performance score51/100
Specification comparison
| Model | VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 240hp179kW | 182hp136kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 240Nm177lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,665kg3,671lb | 1,310kg2,888lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | 1,900kg4,189lb |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 96.5s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph Calculated | 88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.8s | 8.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 35.6s Calculated | 44.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.4s Calculated | 8.0s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK | 7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK | 5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.6s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb Calculated | 139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated | 183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 604km375mi Calculated | 887km551mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,596cc97cu in |
| Length | 4,467mm176in | 4,380mm172in |
| Width | 1,781mm70in | 1,828mm72in |
| Height | 1,670mm66in | 1,626mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,703mm106in | 2,648mm104in |
| Front track | 1,488mm59in | 1,559mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,510mm59in | 1,569mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 140L | 432L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,820L | 1,723L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 7 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 58L | 55L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 144g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC: Power / Torque
- Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 5,600 rpm | 2,400 rpm | 5,850 rpm |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 5,700 rpm | 1,600-5,000 rpm | 5,950 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.4 s | 8.0 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.8 s | 8.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 35.6 s | 44.5 s |
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.8 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.2 s | 10.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.2 s | 13.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.6 s | 16.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 147 km/h 91 mph | 143 km/h 89 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 240 hp 179 kW |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW |
Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC has 58 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.
The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC: 58 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 217 km/h 135 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 7.8 s |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 8.5 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.7 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC: 3.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 604 km 375 mi |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 887 km 551 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 240 hp 179 kW | 7.8 s | 231 km/h 144 mph |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 182 hp 136 kW | 8.5 s | 217 km/h 135 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC |
| 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 8.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK |
| FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | VauxhallZafira B2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 240 hp 179 kW | 182 hp 136 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 240 Nm 177 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.8 s | 8.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 231 km/h 144 mph | 217 km/h 135 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | 1,310 kg 2,888 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.6 L/100 km 24.5 mpg US 29.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 604 km 375 mi | 887 km 551 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 144 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 140 L 4.9 cu ft | 432 L 15.3 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 144 hp/t 107 kW/t 6.9 kg/hp | 139 hp/t 104 kW/t 7.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC | Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.80 LC100 km | 10.85 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 27.04 LC100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,520 LC/year | 1,628 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Vauxhall Zafira B 2.0i 16V Turbo OPC
- Has 58 hp more
- Has 80 Nm more
- Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
- Is 355 kg lighter
- Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 283 km (176 mi) more estimated range
- Has 292 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























