Car comparison

Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V TurbovsFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Opel Zafira B

OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo

240 hp1998 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2005-2008
VS

Ford C-MAX II

1.6 EcoBoost

182 hp1596 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedMinivan / MPV2010-2015

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Lightest
    1,310 kg
    2,888 lb
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    6.2 L/100 km
    37.9 mpg US
    45.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    7.8 L/100 km
    30.2 mpg US
    36.2 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.3 L/100 km
    44.4 mpg US
    53.3 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    144 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    887 km
    551 mi
  • Largest trunk
    432 L
  • Best economy score
    90/100
  • Best practicality score
    84/100

Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    7.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    231 km/h
    144 mph
  • Most powerful
    240 hp
    179 kW
  • Highest torque
    320 Nm
    236 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    144 hp/t
    107 kW/t
    6.9 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    58/100
  • Best performance score
    51/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelOpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurboFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
240hp179kW
182hp136kW
Torque
320Nm236lb-ft
240Nm177lb-ft
Curb weight
1,665kg3,671lb
1,310kg2,888lb
Gross weight
2,200kg4,850lb
1,900kg4,189lb
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
To 99% top speed
95.9s99% target: 229 km/h / 142 mph
Calculated
88.9s99% target: 215 km/h / 133 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
7.8s
8.5s
0-200 km/h
35.5s
Calculated
44.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
7.4s
Calculated
8.0s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.6L/100 km24.5mpg US29.4mpg UK
6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
13.4L/100 km17.6mpg US21.1mpg UK
7.8L/100 km30.2mpg US36.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK
5.3L/100 km44.4mpg US53.3mpg UK
Quarter mile
15.6s
Calculated
16.2s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
144hp/t107kW/t65hp/1000 lb
Calculated
139hp/t104kW/t63hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton
Calculated
183Nm/t123lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
604km375mi
Calculated
887km551mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,998cc122cu in
1,596cc97cu in
Length
4,467mm176in
4,380mm172in
Width
1,801mm71in
1,828mm72in
Height
1,645mm65in
1,626mm64in
Wheelbase
2,703mm106in
2,648mm104in
Front track
1,488mm59in
1,559mm61in
Rear track
1,510mm59in
1,569mm62in
Trunk volume
140L
432L
Max trunk volume
1,820L
1,723L
Doors
5
5
Seats
7
5
Fuel tank
58L
55L
CO2 emissions
230g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V TurboFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoostPowerTorque
  • Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo: Power / Torque
  • Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo5,600 rpm2,400 rpm5,850 rpm
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost5,700 rpm1,600-5,000 rpm5,950 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricOpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurboFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
7.4 s
8.0 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
7.8 s
8.5 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
35.5 s
44.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.5 s
2.7 s
330 ft
101 m
6.8 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.2 s
10.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.2 s
13.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
15.6 s
16.2 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
147 km/h
91 mph
143 km/h
89 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
240 hp
179 kW
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW

Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo has 58 hp more than Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost.

The biggest power difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo: 58 hp (43 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
240 Nm
177 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1,310 kg
2,888 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
231 km/h
144 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
217 km/h
135 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo7.8 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost8.5 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo and Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost and Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo: 3.4 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
604 km
375 mi
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
887 km
551 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
240 hp
179 kW
7.8 s
231 km/h
144 mph
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
182 hp
136 kW
8.5 s
217 km/h
135 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
140 L
4.9 cu ft
Length
4,467 mm
175.9 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
Power
240 hp
179 kW
0-100 km/h7.8 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
182 hp
136 kW
0-100 km/h8.5 s
Top speed
217 km/h
135 mph
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
7.8 s
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
8.5 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleOpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurboFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
Power
240 hp
179 kW
182 hp
136 kW
Torque
320 Nm
236 lb-ft
240 Nm
177 lb-ft
Acceleration
7.8 s
8.5 s
Top speed
231 km/h
144 mph
217 km/h
135 mph
Lightness
1,665 kg
3,671 lb
1,310 kg
2,888 lb
Fuel consumption
9.6 L/100 km
24.5 mpg US
29.4 mpg UK
6.2 L/100 km
37.9 mpg US
45.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
7 seats
Trunk
140 L
4.9 cu ft
Length
4,467 mm
175.9 in
Height
1,645 mm
64.8 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Length
4,380 mm
172.4 in
Height
1,626 mm
64.0 in
Range score
604 km
375 mi
887 km
551 mi
CO2 score
230 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
140 L
4.9 cu ft
432 L
15.3 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
144 hp/t
107 kW/t
6.9 kg/hp
139 hp/t
104 kW/t
7.2 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleOpel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V TurboFord C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Consumption9.6 L/100 km24.5 mpg US29.4 mpg UK6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.80 LC100 km10.85 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi27.04 LC100 mi17.46 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,440 L380 US gal317 UK gal930 L246 US gal205 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,520 LC/year1,628 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo

  • Has 58 hp more
  • Has 80 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost

  • Is 355 kg lighter
  • Uses 3.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 283 km (176 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 292 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 86 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
3.5 V6
VS
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurbovsRenaultEspace IV (PHASE II)3.5 V6
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
3.5i V6 24V
VS
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurbovsRenaultEspace IV3.5i V6 24V
1.6 EcoBoost
2.2 Duratorq TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.2 Duratorq TDCi
OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
2.5 i 20V
VS
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurbovsFordS-MAX2.5 i 20V
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
B 200 Turbo
VS
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurbovsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)B 200 Turbo
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
B 200 Turbo
VS
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurbovsMercedes-BenzB-class (W245)Facelift 2008B 200 Turbo
1.6 EcoBoost
1.4 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20101.4 TSI
OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo
1.4 TSI
VS
OpelZafira BOPC 2.0i 16V TurbovsVolkswagenTouran IFacelift 20061.4 TSI
1.6 EcoBoost
2.0 TSI
VS
FordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoostvsVolkswagenSharan II2.0 TSI
Opel Zafira B OPC 2.0i 16V Turbo vs Ford C-MAX II 1.6 EcoBoost - car comparison - FastVsFaster