Koenigsegg CCX
Car comparison
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8vsFerrari LaFerrari 6.3 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari LaFerrari
6.3 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.9 s
- Fastest top speed400 km/h249 mph
- Most powerful1,032 hp770 kW
- Highest torque1,080 Nm797 lb-ft
- Lightest1,330 kg2,932 lb
- Best power-to-weight776 hp/t579 kW/t1.3 kg/hp
- Best performance score95/100
- Best economy score48/100
Ferrari LaFerrari 6.3 V12
- Best overall score77/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Specification comparison
| Model | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032hp770kW | 800hp597kW |
| Torque | 1,080Nm797lb-ft | 700Nm516lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,330kg2,932lb | 1,430kg3,153lb |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 94.3s99% target: 396 km/h / 246 mph Calculated | 33.1s99% target: 347 km/h / 215 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.9s | 3.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 8.8s | 7.0s |
| 0-60 mph | 2.8s Calculated | 2.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 22L/100 km10.7mpg US12.8mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 18L/100 km13.1mpg US15.7mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 10.5s Calculated | 10.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 776hp/t579kW/t352hp/1000 lb Calculated | 559hp/t417kW/t254hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 812Nm/t543lb-ft/ton Calculated | 490Nm/t328lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 318km198mi Calculated | - |
| Displacement | 4,800cc293cu in | 6,262cc382cu in |
| Length | 4,293mm169in | 4,702mm185in |
| Width | 1,996mm79in | 1,992mm78in |
| Height | 1,114mm44in | 1,116mm44in |
| Wheelbase | - | 2,650mm104in |
| Ground clearance | 100mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 120L | - |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 70L | - |
| CO2 emissions | - | 330g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: Power / Torque
- Ferrari LaFerrari 6.3 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 7,000 rpm | 5,600 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | 9,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm | 9,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.8 s | 2.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.9 s | 3.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 8.8 s | 7.0 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 25.7 s | 19.0 s |
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.7 s | 2.0 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 4.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.9 s | 6.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.9 s | 8.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.5 s | 10.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 221 km/h 137 mph | 250 km/h 155 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW |
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | 800 hp 597 kW |
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 has 232 hp more than Ferrari LaFerrari 6.3 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari LaFerrari 6.3 V12 and Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8: 232 hp (173 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,080 Nm 797 lb-ft |
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb |
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | 350 km/h 217 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 2.9 s |
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | 3.0 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 and Ferrari LaFerrari 6.3 V12: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 776 hp/t 579 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp |
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | 559 hp/t 417 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 2.9 s | 400 km/h 249 mph |
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | 800 hp 597 kW | 3.0 s | 350 km/h 217 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | KoenigseggCCXR 4.8 V8 | FerrariLaFerrari6.3 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 1,032 hp 770 kW | 800 hp 597 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 1,080 Nm 797 lb-ft | 700 Nm 516 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.9 s | 3.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 400 km/h 249 mph | 350 km/h 217 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,330 kg 2,932 lb | 1,430 kg 3,153 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 22.0 L/100 km 10.7 mpg US 12.8 mpg UK | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 318 km 198 mi | - | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 330 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | - | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 776 hp/t 579 kW/t 1.3 kg/hp | 559 hp/t 417 kW/t 1.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 22 L/100 km10.7 mpg US12.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 38.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 61.96 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,300 L872 US gal726 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 5,775 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Koenigsegg CCX R 4.8 V8
- Has 232 hp more
- Has 380 Nm more
- Is 100 kg lighter
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Has 216 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Ferrari LaFerrari 6.3 V12
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























