Ferrari F430
Car comparison
Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32VvsNissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonNissan GT-R (R35)
3.8 V6
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.5 s
- Highest torque588 Nm434 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption12.4 L/100 km19.0 mpg US22.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption18.3 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.1 L/100 km25.8 mpg US31.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range597 km371 mi
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score77/100
- Best performance score90/100
- Best economy score74/100
- Best practicality score48/100
Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V
- Fastest top speed330 km/h205 mph Unrestricted320 km/h199 mph Restricted
- Most powerful490 hp365 kW
- Lightest1,450 kg3,197 lb
- Best power-to-weight338 hp/t252 kW/t3.0 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 490hp365kW | 485hp362kW |
| Torque | 465Nm343lb-ft | 588Nm434lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,450kg3,197lb | 1,740kg3,836lb |
| Gross weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 2,200kg4,850lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 59.6s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated | 55.0s99% target: 317 km/h / 197 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.0s | 3.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.9s Calculated | 10.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.8s Calculated | 3.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK | 12.4L/100 km19mpg US22.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.9L/100 km8.7mpg US10.5mpg UK | 18.3L/100 km12.9mpg US15.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 13.3L/100 km17.7mpg US21.2mpg UK | 9.1L/100 km25.8mpg US31.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.7s Calculated | 11.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 338hp/t252kW/t153hp/1000 lb Calculated | 279hp/t208kW/t126hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 321Nm/t215lb-ft/ton Calculated | 338Nm/t226lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 519km323mi Calculated | 597km371mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,308cc263cu in | 3,799cc232cu in |
| Length | 4,512mm178in | 4,650mm183in |
| Width | 1,923mm76in | 1,895mm75in |
| Height | 1,214mm48in | 1,370mm54in |
| Wheelbase | 2,600mm102in | 2,780mm109in |
| Front track | 1,669mm66in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,616mm64in | 1,600mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 105mm4in |
| Trunk volume | 250L | 315L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 95L | 74L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
- Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 8,500 rpm | 5,250 rpm | 8,750 rpm |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 6,400 rpm | 3,200-5,200 rpm | 6,650 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.8 s | 3.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.0 s | 3.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.9 s | 10.1 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 47.3 s | - |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.3 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.8 s | 7.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.9 s | 9.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.7 s | 11.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 208 km/h 129 mph | 211 km/h 131 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 490 hp 365 kW |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 485 hp 362 kW |
Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V has 5 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V: 5 hp (4 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 4.0 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 3.5 s |
Although Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 18.3 L/100 km 12.9 mpg US 15.4 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 and Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V: 5.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 519 km 323 mi |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 597 km 371 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 490 hp 365 kW | 4.0 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 485 hp 362 kW | 3.5 s | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V |
| 18.3 L/100 km 12.9 mpg US 15.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 |
| 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 18.3 L/100 km 12.9 mpg US 15.4 mpg UK | 4.0 s |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | 3.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 18.3 L/100 km 12.9 mpg US 15.4 mpg UK |
| NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariF4304.3 i V8 32V | NissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 490 hp 365 kW | 485 hp 362 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 465 Nm 343 lb-ft | 588 Nm 434 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.0 s | 3.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | Unrestricted 320 km/h199 mph Restricted 310 km/h193 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,450 kg 3,197 lb | 1,740 kg 3,836 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 18.3 L/100 km 12.9 mpg US 15.4 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km 19.0 mpg US 22.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 519 km 323 mi | 597 km 371 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 250 L 8.8 cu ft | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 338 hp/t 252 kW/t 3.0 kg/hp | 279 hp/t 208 kW/t 3.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V | Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 18.3 L/100 km12.9 mpg US15.4 mpg UK | 12.4 L/100 km19 mpg US22.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 32.03 LC100 km | 21.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 51.54 LC100 mi | 34.92 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,745 L725 US gal604 UK gal | 1,860 L491 US gal409 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,804 LC/year | 3,255 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari F430 4.3 i V8 32V
- Has 5 hp more
- Is 290 kg lighter
- Has 10 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Has 59 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Nissan GT-R (R35) 3.8 V6
- Has 123 Nm more
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 78 km (48 mi) more estimated range
- Has 65 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























