Ferrari F355 Spider
Car comparison
Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8vsMaserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMaserati Spyder
4.2 i V8 32V
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Most powerful390 hp291 kW
- Highest torque451 Nm333 lb-ft
- Lowest combined fuel consumption15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption25.0 L/100 km9.4 mpg US11.3 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption11.0 L/100 km21.4 mpg US25.7 mpg UK
- Best estimated range553 km344 mi
- Largest trunk300 L
- Best overall score62/100
- Best economy score64/100
- Best practicality score35/100
Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.7 s
- Fastest top speed295 km/h183 mph
- Lightest1,515 kg3,340 lb
- Best power-to-weight251 hp/t187 kW/t4.0 kg/hp
- Best performance score74/100
Specification comparison
| Model | FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 380hp283kW | 390hp291kW |
| Torque | 363Nm268lb-ft | 451Nm333lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,515kg3,340lb | 1,720kg3,792lb |
| Gross weight | 1,700kg3,748lb | 1,980kg4,365lb |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 67.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph Calculated | 72.5s99% target: 280 km/h / 174 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.7s | 5.0s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.3s Calculated | 16.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.5s Calculated | 4.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK | 15.9L/100 km14.8mpg US17.8mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 26.1L/100 km9mpg US10.8mpg UK | 25L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK | 11L/100 km21.4mpg US25.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.6s Calculated | 13.0s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb Calculated | 227hp/t169kW/t103hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 262Nm/t175lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 485km301mi Calculated | 553km344mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,496cc213cu in | 4,244cc259cu in |
| Length | 4,250mm167in | 4,303mm169in |
| Width | 1,900mm75in | 1,822mm72in |
| Height | 1,170mm46in | 1,305mm51in |
| Wheelbase | 2,450mm96in | 2,440mm96in |
| Front track | 1,514mm60in | 1,525mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,615mm64in | 1,538mm61in |
| Trunk volume | 220L | 300L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 88L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8: Power / Torque
- Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 8,250 rpm | 6,000 rpm | 8,500 rpm |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 7,000 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.5 s | 4.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.7 s | 5.0 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.3 s | 16.2 s |
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.6 s | 5.7 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.6 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.7 s | 11.0 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.6 s | 13.0 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 188 km/h 117 mph | 180 km/h 112 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 380 hp 283 kW |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW |
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V has 10 hp more than Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8 and Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 283 km/h 176 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 4.7 s |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 5.0 s |
Although Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V has more power, Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8 and Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V and Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8: 1.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 485 km 301 mi |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 553 km 344 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 380 hp 283 kW | 4.7 s | 295 km/h 183 mph |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 390 hp 291 kW | 5.0 s | 283 km/h 176 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 |
| 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | ||||||
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V |
| 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 4.7 s |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | 5.0 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK |
| MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8 | MaseratiSpyder4.2 i V8 32V | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 380 hp 283 kW | 390 hp 291 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 363 Nm 268 lb-ft | 451 Nm 333 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.7 s | 5.0 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 295 km/h 183 mph | 283 km/h 176 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,515 kg 3,340 lb | 1,720 kg 3,792 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 16.9 L/100 km 13.9 mpg US 16.7 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km 14.8 mpg US 17.8 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 485 km 301 mi | 553 km 344 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 220 L 7.8 cu ft | 300 L 10.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 251 hp/t 187 kW/t 4.0 kg/hp | 227 hp/t 169 kW/t 4.4 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8 | Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK | 15.9 L/100 km14.8 mpg US17.8 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 29.57 LC100 km | 27.83 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 47.60 LC100 mi | 44.78 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal | 2,385 L630 US gal525 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 4,436 LC/year | 4,174 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8
- Is 205 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Maserati Spyder 4.2 i V8 32V
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 88 Nm more
- Uses 1.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 80 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























