Car comparison

Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8vsBMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari F355 Spider

3.5 V8

380 hp3496 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1995-1999
VS

BMW M3 Convertible (E36)

3.2

321 hp3201 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCabriolet / convertible1995-1999

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.7 s
  • Fastest top speed
    295 km/h
    183 mph
  • Most powerful
    380 hp
    283 kW
  • Highest torque
    363 Nm
    268 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,515 kg
    3,340 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    251 hp/t
    187 kW/t
    4.0 kg/hp
  • Best overall score
    60/100
  • Best performance score
    74/100

BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.1 L/100 km
    21.2 mpg US
    25.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    17.0 L/100 km
    13.8 mpg US
    16.6 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    7.7 L/100 km
    30.5 mpg US
    36.7 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    559 km
    347 mi
  • Largest trunk
    230 L
  • Best economy score
    77/100
  • Best practicality score
    42/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
380hp283kW
321hp239kW
Torque
363Nm268lb-ft
350Nm258lb-ft
Curb weight
1,515kg3,340lb
1,560kg3,439lb
Gross weight
1,700kg3,748lb
1,980kg4,365lb
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
To 99% top speed
67.0s99% target: 292 km/h / 181 mph
Calculated
75.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.7s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
14.3s
Calculated
20.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.5s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
16.9L/100 km13.9mpg US16.7mpg UK
11.1L/100 km21.2mpg US25.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
26.1L/100 km9mpg US10.8mpg UK
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
11.9L/100 km19.8mpg US23.7mpg UK
7.7L/100 km30.5mpg US36.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.6s
Calculated
13.7s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
251hp/t187kW/t114hp/1000 lb
Calculated
206hp/t153kW/t93hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
240Nm/t160lb-ft/ton
Calculated
224Nm/t150lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
485km301mi
Calculated
559km347mi
Calculated
Displacement
3,496cc213cu in
3,201cc195cu in
Length
4,250mm167in
4,433mm175in
Width
1,900mm75in
1,710mm67in
Height
1,170mm46in
1,340mm53in
Wheelbase
2,450mm96in
2,700mm106in
Front track
1,514mm60in
1,422mm56in
Rear track
1,615mm64in
1,444mm57in
Trunk volume
220L
230L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
82L
62L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2PowerTorque
  • Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8: Power / Torque
  • BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V88,250 rpm6,000 rpm8,500 rpm
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.27,400 rpm3,250 rpm7,650 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.5 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.7 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.3 s
20.1 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.6 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.7 s
11.6 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.6 s
13.7 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
188 km/h
117 mph
169 km/h
105 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
380 hp
283 kW
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
321 hp
239 kW

Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8 has 59 hp more than BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2.

The biggest power difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8: 59 hp (44 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
350 Nm
258 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
1,560 kg
3,439 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
295 km/h
183 mph
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V84.7 s
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.25.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8 and BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2: 0.9 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 and Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8: 5.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
206 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
485 km
301 mi
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
559 km
347 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
380 hp
283 kW
4.7 s
295 km/h
183 mph
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
321 hp
239 kW
5.6 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,250 mm
167.3 in
Height
1,170 mm
46.1 in
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
321 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
Power
380 hp
283 kW
0-100 km/h4.7 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
321 hp
239 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
4.7 s
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
5.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
206 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2
Power
380 hp
283 kW
321 hp
239 kW
Torque
363 Nm
268 lb-ft
350 Nm
258 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.7 s
5.6 s
Top speed
295 km/h
183 mph
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Lightness
1,515 kg
3,340 lb
1,560 kg
3,439 lb
Fuel consumption
16.9 L/100 km
13.9 mpg US
16.7 mpg UK
11.1 L/100 km
21.2 mpg US
25.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
220 L
7.8 cu ft
Length
4,250 mm
167.3 in
Height
1,170 mm
46.1 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,433 mm
174.5 in
Height
1,340 mm
52.8 in
Range score
485 km
301 mi
559 km
347 mi
Trunk score
220 L
7.8 cu ft
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
251 hp/t
187 kW/t
4.0 kg/hp
206 hp/t
153 kW/t
4.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
Consumption16.9 L/100 km13.9 mpg US16.7 mpg UK11.1 L/100 km21.2 mpg US25.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km29.57 LC100 km19.43 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi47.60 LC100 mi31.26 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used2,535 L670 US gal558 UK gal1,665 L440 US gal366 UK gal
Annual fuel cost4,436 LC/year2,914 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8

  • Has 59 hp more
  • Has 13 Nm more
  • Is 45 kg lighter
  • Is 0.9 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 35 km/h (22 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 45 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Smallest trunk

BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2

  • Uses 5.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 73 km (46 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 10 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8
BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

3.5 V8
3.5 V8
VS
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8vsFerrariF355 GTS3.5 V8
3.2
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Convertible (E46)3.2i 24V
3.5 V8
3.5 V8
VS
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8vsFerrariF355 Berlinetta3.5 V8
3.2
3.2
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Coupe (E36)3.2
3.5 V8
360 Spider
VS
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8vsFerrari360 Modena Spider360 Spider
3.2
3.2
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 (E36)3.2
3.5 V8
550
VS
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8vsFerrari550 Barchetta Pininfarina550
3.2
3.2i 24V
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Coupe (E46)3.2i 24V
3.5 V8
5.9 V12
VS
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8vsAston MartinDB7 Volante5.9 V12
3.2
4.0 V8
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Convertible (E93)4.0 V8
3.5 V8
3.4 i V8 32V
VS
FerrariF355 Spider3.5 V8vsFerrariMondial t Cabriolet3.4 i V8 32V
3.2
2.3
VS
BMWM3 Convertible (E36)3.2vsBMWM3 Convertible (E30)2.3
Ferrari F355 Spider 3.5 V8 vs BMW M3 Convertible (E36) 3.2 - car comparison - FastVsFaster