Spyker C8 Preliator
Car comparison
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40VvsFerrari California T 3.9 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari California T
3.9 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.6 s
- Most powerful560 hp418 kW
- Highest torque755 Nm557 lb-ft
- Largest trunk241 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score79/100
- Best practicality score45/100
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
- Fastest top speed322 km/h200 mph
- Lightest1,390 kg3,064 lb
- Best power-to-weight378 hp/t282 kW/t2.6 kg/hp
Specification comparison
| Model | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 525hp391kW | 560hp418kW |
| Torque | 600Nm443lb-ft | 755Nm557lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,390kg3,064lb | 1,625kg3,583lb |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 49.6s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph Calculated | 66.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.7s | 3.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 10.0s Calculated | 11.2s |
| 0-60 mph | 3.5s Calculated | 3.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 11.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 378hp/t282kW/t171hp/1000 lb Calculated | 345hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 432Nm/t289lb-ft/ton Calculated | 465Nm/t311lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 743km462mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,172cc255cu in | 3,855cc235cu in |
| Length | 4,628mm182in | 4,570mm180in |
| Width | 1,953mm77in | 1,910mm75in |
| Height | 1,202mm47in | 1,322mm52in |
| Wheelbase | 2,725mm107in | 2,670mm105in |
| Front track | 1,625mm64in | 1,631mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,605mm63in |
| Trunk volume | 120L | 241L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 340L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 4 |
| Fuel tank | 57L | 78L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 250g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 6,800 rpm | 3,500 rpm | 7,200 rpm |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 7,500 rpm | 4,750 rpm | 7,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.5 s | 3.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.7 s | 3.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 10.0 s | 11.2 s |
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.0 s | 1.9 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.1 s | 5.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.5 s | 7.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.6 s | 9.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 11.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 215 km/h 133 mph | 202 km/h 126 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 525 hp 391 kW |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW |
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 has 35 hp more than Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V.
The biggest power difference is between Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V and Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: 35 hp (26 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 3.7 s |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 3.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V: 0.1 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | 525 hp 391 kW | 3.7 s | 322 km/h 200 mph |
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | 560 hp 418 kW | 3.6 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | SpykerC8 Preliator4.2 V8 40V | FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 525 hp 391 kW | 560 hp 418 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 600 Nm 443 lb-ft | 755 Nm 557 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.7 s | 3.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 322 km/h 200 mph | 315 km/h 196 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,390 kg 3,064 lb | 1,625 kg 3,583 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 10.5 L/100 km 22.4 mpg US 26.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 743 km 462 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 250 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 120 L 4.2 cu ft | 241 L 8.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 378 hp/t 282 kW/t 2.6 kg/hp | 345 hp/t 257 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.38 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.57 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,756 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Spyker C8 Preliator 4.2 V8 40V
- Is 235 kg lighter
- Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
- Has 33 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Smallest trunk
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
- Has 35 hp more
- Has 155 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 121 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























