Car comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8vsFerrari California T 3.9 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Jaguar F-type Coupe

SVR 5.0 V8

575 hp5000 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticSuperchargedCoupe2016-2017
VS

Ferrari California T

3.9 V8

560 hp3855 ccGasolineRWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2014-2017

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    3.6 s
  • Highest torque
    755 Nm
    557 lb-ft
  • Lightest
    1,625 kg
    3,583 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    345 hp/t
    257 kW/t
    2.9 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    10.5 L/100 km
    22.4 mpg US
    26.9 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    250 g/km
  • Best estimated range
    743 km
    462 mi
  • Best overall score
    78/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best economy score
    79/100
  • Best practicality score
    45/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Power
575hp429kW
560hp418kW
Torque
700Nm516lb-ft
755Nm557lb-ft
Curb weight
1,705kg3,759lb
1,625kg3,583lb
Gross weight
2,150kg4,740lb
-
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
55.5s99% target: 319 km/h / 198 mph
Calculated
66.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.7s
3.6s
0-200 km/h
10.4s
Calculated
11.2s
0-60 mph
3.5s
Calculated
3.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.3L/100 km20.8mpg US25.0mpg UK
10.5L/100 km22.4mpg US26.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
16.2L/100 km14.5mpg US17.4mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
8.5L/100 km27.7mpg US33.2mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
11.4s
Calculated
11.5s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
337hp/t251kW/t153hp/1000 lb
Calculated
345hp/t257kW/t156hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
411Nm/t275lb-ft/ton
Calculated
465Nm/t311lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
619km385mi
Calculated
743km462mi
Calculated
Displacement
5,000cc305cu in
3,855cc235cu in
Length
4,475mm176in
4,570mm180in
Width
1,923mm76in
1,910mm75in
Height
1,311mm52in
1,322mm52in
Wheelbase
2,622mm103in
2,670mm105in
Front track
1,585mm62in
1,631mm64in
Rear track
1,611mm63in
1,605mm63in
Trunk volume
408L
241L
Max trunk volume-
340L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
70L
78L
CO2 emissions
269g/km
250g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8Ferrari California T 3.9 V8PowerTorque
  • Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari California T 3.9 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V86,500 rpm3,500-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V87,500 rpm4,750 rpm7,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.5 s
3.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.7 s
3.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
10.4 s
11.2 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.9 s
330 ft
101 m
5.1 s
5.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.6 s
7.5 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.6 s
9.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
11.4 s
11.5 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
210 km/h
131 mph
202 km/h
126 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
560 hp
418 kW

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 has 15 hp more than Ferrari California T 3.9 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: 15 hp (11 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
755 Nm
557 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
1,625 kg
3,583 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
322 km/h
200 mph
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V83.7 s
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V83.6 s

Although Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 has more power, Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: 0.1 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 and Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8: 0.8 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
337 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
619 km
385 mi
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
743 km
462 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
575 hp
429 kW
3.7 s
322 km/h
200 mph
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
560 hp
418 kW
3.6 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
241 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
0-100 km/h3.7 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Power
560 hp
418 kW
0-100 km/h3.6 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
3.7 s
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
3.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8
337 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleJaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Power
575 hp
429 kW
560 hp
418 kW
Torque
700 Nm
516 lb-ft
755 Nm
557 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.7 s
3.6 s
Top speed
322 km/h
200 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,705 kg
3,759 lb
1,625 kg
3,583 lb
Fuel consumption
11.3 L/100 km
20.8 mpg US
25.0 mpg UK
10.5 L/100 km
22.4 mpg US
26.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
408 L
14.4 cu ft
Length
4,475 mm
176.2 in
Height
1,311 mm
51.6 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
241 L
8.5 cu ft
Length
4,570 mm
179.9 in
Height
1,322 mm
52.0 in
Range score
619 km
385 mi
743 km
462 mi
CO2 score
269 g/km
250 g/km
Trunk score
408 L
14.4 cu ft
241 L
8.5 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
337 hp/t
251 kW/t
3.0 kg/hp
345 hp/t
257 kW/t
2.9 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleJaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
Consumption11.3 L/100 km20.8 mpg US25 mpg UK10.5 L/100 km22.4 mpg US26.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km19.78 LC100 km18.38 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi31.82 LC100 mi29.57 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,695 L448 US gal373 UK gal1,575 L416 US gal346 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,966 LC/year2,756 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8

  • Has 15 hp more
  • Has 7 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 167 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Ferrari California T 3.9 V8

  • Has 55 Nm more
  • Is 80 kg lighter
  • Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Uses 0.8 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 7 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 123 km (77 mi) more estimated range
  • Emits 19 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest torque
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8
Ferrari California T 3.9 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
30 4.3 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrariCalifornia30 4.3 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type CoupeFacelift 20205.0 V8
3.9 V8
3.9 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleSVR 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
4.5 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrari458 Spider4.5 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 2017SVR 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
4.5 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrari458 Speciale4.5 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarF-type ConvertibleFacelift 20205.0 V8
3.9 V8
4.5 V8
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrari458 Italia4.5 V8
SVR 5.0 V8
R-S 5.0 V8
VS
JaguarF-type CoupeSVR 5.0 V8vsJaguarXK Coupe (X150)Facelift 2011R-S 5.0 V8
3.9 V8
6.3 V12
VS
FerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8vsFerrariFF6.3 V12
Jaguar F-type Coupe SVR 5.0 V8 vs Ferrari California T 3.9 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster