Jaguar XJ220
Car comparison
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6vsFerrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 550 Maranello
5.5 V12
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h3.8 s
- Fastest top speed342 km/h213 mph
- Most powerful542 hp404 kW
- Highest torque640 Nm472 lb-ft
- Lightest1,350 kg2,976 lb
- Best power-to-weight401 hp/t299 kW/t2.5 kg/hp
- Best overall score74/100
- Best performance score91/100
- Best practicality score39/100
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
- Best economy score42/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 542hp404kW | 485hp362kW |
| Torque | 640Nm472lb-ft | 569Nm420lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,350kg2,976lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 53.9s99% target: 339 km/h / 210 mph Calculated | 72.7s99% target: 327 km/h / 203 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 3.8s | 4.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 9.9s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 3.6s Calculated | 4.2s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | - | 24.4L/100 km9.6mpg US11.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 38.2L/100 km6.2mpg US7.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 16.4L/100 km14.3mpg US17.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 11.3s Calculated | 12.2s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 401hp/t299kW/t182hp/1000 lb Calculated | 287hp/t214kW/t130hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 474Nm/t317lb-ft/ton Calculated | 337Nm/t225lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | - | 467km290mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,498cc213cu in | 5,474cc334cu in |
| Length | 4,930mm194in | 4,550mm179in |
| Width | 2,000mm79in | 1,935mm76in |
| Height | 1,150mm45in | 1,277mm50in |
| Wheelbase | 2,640mm104in | 2,500mm98in |
| Front track | - | 1,632mm64in |
| Rear track | - | 1,586mm62in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | - | 185L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | - | 114L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 7,200 rpm | 4,500 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 7,000 rpm | 5,000 rpm | 7,500 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 3.6 s | 4.2 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 3.8 s | 4.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 9.9 s | 12.5 s |
0-200 mph 0-322 km/h | 32.8 s | 57.2 s |
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.2 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 7.6 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 9.7 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 11.3 s | 12.2 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 217 km/h 135 mph | 197 km/h 123 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 542 hp 404 kW |
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 485 hp 362 kW |
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 has 57 hp more than Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 and Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6: 57 hp (43 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft |
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb |
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 3.8 s |
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 4.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6 and Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12: 0.6 s.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp |
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | 542 hp 404 kW | 3.8 s | 342 km/h 213 mph |
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | 485 hp 362 kW | 4.4 s | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarXJ2203.5 BiTurbo V6 | Ferrari550 Maranello5.5 V12 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 542 hp 404 kW | 485 hp 362 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 640 Nm 472 lb-ft | 569 Nm 420 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 3.8 s | 4.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 342 km/h 213 mph | Unrestricted 330 km/h205 mph Restricted 320 km/h199 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,350 kg 2,976 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | - | 24.4 L/100 km 9.6 mpg US 11.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | - | 467 km 290 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 185 L 6.5 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 401 hp/t 299 kW/t 2.5 kg/hp | 287 hp/t 214 kW/t 3.5 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12 |
|---|---|
| Consumption | 24.4 L/100 km9.6 mpg US11.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 42.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 68.72 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 3,660 L967 US gal805 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 6,405 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar XJ220 3.5 BiTurbo V6
- Has 57 hp more
- Has 71 Nm more
- Is 340 kg lighter
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 12 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 114 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Ferrari 550 Maranello 5.5 V12
No measurable advantages in the available data.
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























