Car comparison

Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8vsNissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari 458 Spider

4.5 V8

570 hp4497 ccGasolineRWDAutomaticNaturally aspiratedCoupe2011-2015
VS

Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010

Nismo 3.8 V6

600 hp3799 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTwin-turboCoupe2014-2016

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    2.7 s
  • Most powerful
    600 hp
    447 kW
  • Highest torque
    652 Nm
    481 lb-ft
  • Largest trunk
    315 L
  • Best overall score
    79/100
  • Best performance score
    93/100
  • Best practicality score
    48/100

Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8

  • Fastest top speed
    335 km/h
    208 mph Unrestricted
    320 km/h
    199 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,535 kg
    3,384 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    371 hp/t
    277 kW/t
    2.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    729 km
    453 mi
  • Best economy score
    75/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrari458 Spider4.5 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
570hp425kW
600hp447kW
Torque
540Nm398lb-ft
652Nm481lb-ft
Curb weight
1,535kg3,384lb
1,660kg3,660lb
Gross weight-
2,200kg4,850lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Calculated
315 km/h
196 mph
To 99% top speed
49.3s99% target: 332 km/h / 206 mph
Calculated
36.3s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
3.4s
2.7s
0-200 km/h
9.1s
Calculated
7.4s
Calculated
0-60 mph
3.3s
Calculated
2.6s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
Fuel consumption city-
17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway-
8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK
Quarter mile
10.9s
Calculated
10.0s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
371hp/t277kW/t168hp/1000 lb
Calculated
361hp/t270kW/t164hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
352Nm/t235lb-ft/ton
Calculated
393Nm/t263lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
729km453mi
Calculated
627km390mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,497cc274cu in
3,799cc232cu in
Length
4,527mm178in
4,680mm184in
Width
1,937mm76in
1,895mm75in
Height
1,211mm48in
1,370mm54in
Wheelbase
2,650mm104in
2,780mm109in
Front track
1,672mm66in
1,600mm63in
Rear track
1,606mm63in
1,600mm63in
Ground clearance-
105mm4in
Trunk volume
230L
315L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
4
Fuel tank
86L
74L
CO2 emissions
275g/km
-

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6PowerTorque
  • Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8: Power / Torque
  • Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V89,000 rpm6,000 rpm9,250 rpm
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V66,800 rpm3,200-5,800 rpm7,050 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrari458 Spider4.5 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
3.3 s
2.6 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
3.4 s
2.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
9.1 s
7.4 s
0-200 mph
0-322 km/h
34.1 s
-
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Likely limited
315 km/h
196 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.0 s
1.8 s
330 ft
101 m
4.9 s
4.5 s
1/8 mile
201 m
7.3 s
6.6 s
1000 ft
305 m
9.3 s
8.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
10.9 s
10.0 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
222 km/h
138 mph
233 km/h
145 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
570 hp
425 kW
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 has 30 hp more than Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8 and Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6: 30 hp (22 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
652 Nm
481 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
1,660 kg
3,660 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
315 km/h
196 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V83.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V62.7 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 and Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8: 0.7 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
371 hp/t
277 kW/t
2.7 kg/hp
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
361 hp/t
270 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
729 km
453 mi
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
627 km
390 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
570 hp
425 kW
3.4 s
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
600 hp
447 kW
2.7 s
315 km/h
196 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,211 mm
47.7 in
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,680 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
Power
570 hp
425 kW
0-100 km/h3.4 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
600 hp
447 kW
0-100 km/h2.7 s
Top speed
315 km/h
196 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
3.4 s
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
2.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8
371 hp/t
277 kW/t
2.7 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
361 hp/t
270 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrari458 Spider4.5 V8NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6
Power
570 hp
425 kW
600 hp
447 kW
Torque
540 Nm
398 lb-ft
652 Nm
481 lb-ft
Acceleration
3.4 s
2.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
335 km/h208 mph
Restricted
320 km/h199 mph
315 km/h
196 mph
Lightness
1,535 kg
3,384 lb
1,660 kg
3,660 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
230 L
8.1 cu ft
Length
4,527 mm
178.2 in
Height
1,211 mm
47.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
4 seats
Trunk
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Length
4,680 mm
184.3 in
Height
1,370 mm
53.9 in
Range score
729 km
453 mi
627 km
390 mi
CO2 score
275 g/km
-
Trunk score
230 L
8.1 cu ft
315 L
11.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
371 hp/t
277 kW/t
2.7 kg/hp
361 hp/t
270 kW/t
2.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km20.65 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi33.23 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year3,098 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8

  • Is 125 kg lighter
  • Has 20 km/h (12 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 102 km (63 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6

  • Has 30 hp more
  • Has 112 Nm more
  • Is 0.7 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 85 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8
Nissan GT-R (R35) Nismo 3.8 V6
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

4.5 V8
4.5 V8
VS
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8vsFerrari458 Italia4.5 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Nismo 3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6
4.5 V8
4.5 V8
VS
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8vsFerrari458 Speciale4.5 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
3.8 V6
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsNissanGT-R (R35)3.8 V6
4.5 V8
4.5 V8
VS
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8vsFerrari458 Speciale A4.5 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991)Turbo S 3.8
4.5 V8
3.9 V8
VS
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8vsFerrariCalifornia T3.9 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
6.0 V12
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsAston MartinVanquish II6.0 V12
4.5 V8
6.3 V12
VS
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8vsFerrariFF6.3 V12
Nismo 3.8 V6
FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsMercedes-BenzSLS AMG Coupe (C197)FINAL EDITION GT 6.2 V8
4.5 V8
3.9 V8
VS
Ferrari458 Spider4.5 V8vsFerrariGTC4Lusso T3.9 V8
Nismo 3.8 V6
Turbo S 3.8
VS
NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2010Nismo 3.8 V6vsPorsche911 (991 II)Turbo S 3.8
Ferrari 458 Spider 4.5 V8 vs Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2010 Nismo 3.8 V6 - car comparison - FastVsFaster