Car comparison

Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48VvsFerrari 348 TB 3.4 V8

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Ferrari 512 TR

4.9 i V12 48V

428 hp4943 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1992-1994
VS

Ferrari 348 TB

3.4 V8

300 hp3405 ccGasolineRWDManualNaturally aspiratedCoupe1989-1993

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.8 s
  • Fastest top speed
    314 km/h
    195 mph
  • Most powerful
    428 hp
    319 kW
  • Highest torque
    491 Nm
    362 lb-ft
  • Best power-to-weight
    269 hp/t
    201 kW/t
    3.7 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    11.8 L/100 km
    19.9 mpg US
    23.9 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    847 km
    527 mi
  • Best overall score
    67/100
  • Best performance score
    80/100
  • Best economy score
    75/100
  • Best practicality score
    38/100

Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8

  • Lightest
    1,393 kg
    3,071 lb
  • Lowest city consumption
    19.6 L/100 km
    12.0 mpg US
    14.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest highway consumption
    9.5 L/100 km
    24.8 mpg US
    29.7 mpg UK

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelFerrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48VFerrari348 TB3.4 V8
Power
428hp319kW
300hp224kW
Torque
491Nm362lb-ft
324Nm239lb-ft
Curb weight
1,590kg3,505lb
1,393kg3,071lb
Gross weight-
1,680kg3,704lb
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
275 km/h
171 mph
To 99% top speed
74.1s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph
Calculated
77.7s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.8s
5.6s
0-200 km/h
14.0s
Calculated
18.5s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.6s
Calculated
5.3s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK
12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
25.1L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK
19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK
Quarter mile
12.7s
Calculated
13.6s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
269hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb
Calculated
215hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton
Calculated
233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
847km527mi
Calculated
760km472mi
Calculated
Displacement
4,943cc302cu in
3,405cc208cu in
Length
4,480mm176in
4,230mm167in
Width
1,975mm78in
1,894mm75in
Height
1,135mm45in
1,170mm46in
Wheelbase
2,550mm100in
2,450mm96in
Front track
1,530mm60in
1,502mm59in
Rear track
1,645mm65in
1,578mm62in
Trunk volume-
200L
Doors
2
2
Seats
2
2
Fuel tank
100L
95L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48VFerrari 348 TB 3.4 V8PowerTorque
  • Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
  • Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V6,750 rpm5,500 rpm7,000 rpm
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V87,200 rpm4,200 rpm7,450 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricFerrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48VFerrari348 TB3.4 V8
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.6 s
5.3 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.8 s
5.6 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
14.0 s
18.5 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
275 km/h
171 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.2 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.7 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.4 s
9.0 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.8 s
11.5 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.7 s
13.6 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
190 km/h
118 mph
173 km/h
107 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
428 hp
319 kW
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
300 hp
224 kW

Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V has 128 hp more than Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8.

The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 and Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: 128 hp (95 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
491 Nm
362 lb-ft
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
324 Nm
239 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
1,393 kg
3,071 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
314 km/h
195 mph
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
275 km/h
171 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V4.8 s
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V85.6 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 0.8 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
269 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
215 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
847 km
527 mi
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
760 km
472 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
428 hp
319 kW
4.8 s
314 km/h
195 mph
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
300 hp
224 kW
5.6 s
275 km/h
171 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
Power
428 hp
319 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,480 mm
176.4 in
Height
1,135 mm
44.7 in
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,170 mm
46.1 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
Power
428 hp
319 kW
0-100 km/h4.8 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
Power
300 hp
224 kW
0-100 km/h5.6 s
Top speed
275 km/h
171 mph
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
4.8 s
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
5.6 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V
269 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8
215 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleFerrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48VFerrari348 TB3.4 V8
Power
428 hp
319 kW
300 hp
224 kW
Torque
491 Nm
362 lb-ft
324 Nm
239 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.8 s
5.6 s
Top speed
314 km/h
195 mph
275 km/h
171 mph
Lightness
1,590 kg
3,505 lb
1,393 kg
3,071 lb
Fuel consumption
11.8 L/100 km
19.9 mpg US
23.9 mpg UK
12.5 L/100 km
18.8 mpg US
22.6 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk-
Length
4,480 mm
176.4 in
Height
1,135 mm
44.7 in
Doors/seats
2 doors
2 seats
Trunk
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Length
4,230 mm
166.5 in
Height
1,170 mm
46.1 in
Range score
847 km
527 mi
760 km
472 mi
Trunk score
-
200 L
7.1 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
269 hp/t
201 kW/t
3.7 kg/hp
215 hp/t
161 kW/t
4.6 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleFerrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48VFerrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
Consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km20.65 LC100 km21.88 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi33.23 LC100 mi35.20 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal
Annual fuel cost3,098 LC/year3,281 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V

  • Has 128 hp more
  • Has 167 Nm more
  • Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Heaviest

Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8

  • Is 197 kg lighter

Pros

  • Lightest

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Lowest power
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V vs Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 - car comparison - FastVsFaster