Ferrari 512 TR
Car comparison
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48VvsFerrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonFerrari 348 TB
3.4 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.8 s
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful428 hp319 kW
- Highest torque491 Nm362 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight269 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Best overall score67/100
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score38/100
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
- Lightest1,393 kg3,071 lb
- Lowest city consumption19.6 L/100 km12.0 mpg US14.4 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption9.5 L/100 km24.8 mpg US29.7 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 428hp319kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 324Nm239lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,393kg3,071lb |
| Gross weight | - | 1,680kg3,704lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.1s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 77.7s99% target: 272 km/h / 169 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 5.6s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 18.5s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 5.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 12.5L/100 km18.8mpg US22.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.1L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 9.5L/100 km24.8mpg US29.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 13.6s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 269hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 215hp/t161kW/t98hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 233Nm/t156lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 760km472mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,943cc302cu in | 3,405cc208cu in |
| Length | 4,480mm176in | 4,230mm167in |
| Width | 1,975mm78in | 1,894mm75in |
| Height | 1,135mm45in | 1,170mm46in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,450mm96in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,502mm59in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,578mm62in |
| Trunk volume | - | 200L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 95L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 7,200 rpm | 4,200 rpm | 7,450 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 5.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 5.6 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 18.5 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 9.0 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 11.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 13.6 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 173 km/h 107 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 428 hp 319 kW |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V has 128 hp more than Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8.
The biggest power difference is between Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 and Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: 128 hp (95 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 1,393 kg 3,071 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 275 km/h 171 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 4.8 s |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 5.6 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 0.8 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8: 0.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 847 km 527 mi |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 760 km 472 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 428 hp 319 kW | 4.8 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 300 hp 224 kW | 5.6 s | 275 km/h 171 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 |
| 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | 5.6 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari348 TB3.4 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 428 hp 319 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 324 Nm 239 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 5.6 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 275 km/h 171 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,393 kg 3,071 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km 18.8 mpg US 22.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 760 km 472 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 200 L 7.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 215 hp/t 161 kW/t 4.6 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V | Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 12.5 L/100 km18.8 mpg US22.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 21.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 35.20 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,875 L495 US gal412 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 3,281 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
- Has 128 hp more
- Has 167 Nm more
- Is 0.8 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 39 km/h (24 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 54 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 87 km (54 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Heaviest
Ferrari 348 TB 3.4 V8
- Is 197 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























