Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247)
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250vsDS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDS 7 Crossback
1.6 PureTech
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Most powerful225 hp168 kW
- Lightest1,428 kg3,148 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t117 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption6.4 L/100 km36.8 mpg US44.1 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption5.0 L/100 km47.0 mpg US56.5 mpg UK
- Best estimated range1,127 km700 mi
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h6.9 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score56/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 225hp168kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,465kg3,230lb | 1,428kg3,148lb |
| Gross weight | 2,070kg4,564lb | 2,050kg4,519lb |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.4s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 89.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 6.9s | 8.2s |
| 0-200 km/h | 26.1s Calculated | 33.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 7.8s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.7L/100 km35.1mpg US42.2mpg UK | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 14.9s Calculated | 15.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 153hp/t114kW/t69hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 239Nm/t160lb-ft/ton Calculated | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 642km399mi Calculated | 1,127km700mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,410mm174in | 4,573mm180in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,906mm75in |
| Height | 1,611mm63in | 1,625mm64in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,738mm108in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,621mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,598mm63in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | 190mm7in |
| Trunk volume | 435L | 555L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,430L | 1,752L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 43L | 62L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: Power / Torque
- DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 5,800 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,050 rpm |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 7.8 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 6.9 s | 8.2 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 26.1 s | 33.4 s |
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.7 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 7.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 10.5 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 13.5 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 14.9 s | 15.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 158 km/h 98 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW |
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech has 1 hp more than Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250.
The biggest power difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,428 kg 3,148 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 234 km/h 145 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 6.9 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 8.2 s |
Although DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech has more power, Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 1.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250: 1.2 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 642 km 399 mi |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,127 km 700 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 6.9 s | 240 km/h 149 mph |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.2 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 |
| 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 6.9 s |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK |
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)GLA 250 | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 225 hp 168 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 6.9 s | 8.2 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 240 km/h 149 mph | 234 km/h 145 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,465 kg 3,230 lb | 1,428 kg 3,148 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.7 L/100 km 35.1 mpg US 42.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 642 km 399 mi | 1,127 km 700 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 435 L 15.4 cu ft | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 153 hp/t 114 kW/t 6.5 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250 | DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.7 L/100 km35.1 mpg US42.2 mpg UK | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 11.73 LC100 km | 9.63 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 18.87 LC100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,005 L265 US gal221 UK gal | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,759 LC/year | 1,444 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) GLA 250
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 1.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 6 km/h (4 mph) higher top speed
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Has 1 hp more
- Is 37 kg lighter
- Uses 1.2 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 5 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 485 km (302 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























