DS 7 Crossback
Car comparison
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTechvsVolvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonVolvo XC60 II
2.0 B5
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Fastest top speed234 km/h145 mph
- Lightest1,428 kg3,148 lb
- Best power-to-weight158 hp/t117 kW/t6.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
- Largest trunk555 L
- Best economy score92/100
- Best practicality score86/100
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.1 s
- Most powerful235 hp175 kW
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Best estimated range1,203 km748 mi
- Best overall score64/100
- Best performance score54/100
Specification comparison
| Model | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 225hp168kW | 235hp175kW |
| Torque | 300Nm221lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,428kg3,148lb | 1,950kg4,299lb |
| Gross weight | 2,050kg4,519lb | - |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 89.5s99% target: 232 km/h / 144 mph Calculated | 79.9s99% target: 218 km/h / 135 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 8.2s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 33.4s Calculated | 36.7s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.8s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK | 5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 6.4L/100 km36.8mpg US44.1mpg UK | - |
| Fuel consumption highway | 5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK | - |
| Quarter mile | 15.9s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 158hp/t117kW/t71hp/1000 lb Calculated | 121hp/t90kW/t55hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 210Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated | 246Nm/t165lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 1,127km700mi Calculated | 1,203km748mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,598cc98cu in | 1,969cc120cu in |
| Length | 4,573mm180in | 4,688mm185in |
| Width | 1,906mm75in | 1,902mm75in |
| Height | 1,625mm64in | 1,658mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,738mm108in | 2,865mm113in |
| Front track | 1,621mm64in | 1,668mm66in |
| Rear track | 1,598mm63in | 1,673mm66in |
| Ground clearance | 190mm7in | 216mm9in |
| Trunk volume | 555L | 505L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,752L | 1,432L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 62L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 155g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: Power / Torque
- Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5,500 rpm | 1,900 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 4,000 rpm | 1,740-2,280 rpm | 5,000 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.8 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 8.2 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 33.4 s | 36.7 s |
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.7 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 7.0 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.5 s | 9.8 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.5 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.9 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 150 km/h 93 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW |
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 has 10 hp more than DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech.
The biggest power difference is between DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech and Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,428 kg 3,148 lb |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 220 km/h 137 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 8.2 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 and DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech: 1.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 1,127 km 700 mi |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 1,203 km 748 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 225 hp 168 kW | 8.2 s | 234 km/h 145 mph |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 235 hp 175 kW | 7.1 s | 220 km/h 137 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech |
| 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 |
| 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 8.2 s |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK |
| VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | DS7 Crossback1.6 PureTech | VolvoXC60 II2.0 B5 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 225 hp 168 kW | 235 hp 175 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 8.2 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 234 km/h 145 mph | 220 km/h 137 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,428 kg 3,148 lb | 1,950 kg 4,299 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 5.5 L/100 km 42.8 mpg US 51.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km 39.9 mpg US 47.9 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 1,127 km 700 mi | 1,203 km 748 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 155 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 555 L 19.6 cu ft | 505 L 17.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 158 hp/t 117 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 121 hp/t 90 kW/t 8.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech | Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK | 5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 9.63 LC100 km | 10.33 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 15.49 LC100 mi | 16.62 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 825 L218 US gal181 UK gal | 885 L234 US gal195 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,444 LC/year | 1,549 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
DS 7 Crossback 1.6 PureTech
- Is 522 kg lighter
- Has 14 km/h (9 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 37 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 50 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
Volvo XC60 II 2.0 B5
- Has 10 hp more
- Has 180 Nm more
- Is 1.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 76 km (47 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























