Car comparison

DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THPvsFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

DS 4 Crossback

1.6 THP

210 hp1598 ccGasolineFWDManualTurbochargedCrossover2015-2018
VS

Ford Galaxy III

2.0 TDCi

210 hp1997 ccDieselFWDAutomaticTwin-turboMinivan / MPV2015-2018

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    8.4 s
  • Fastest top speed
    235 km/h
    146 mph
  • Most powerful
    210 hp
    157 kW
  • Lightest
    1,387 kg
    3,058 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    151 hp/t
    113 kW/t
    6.6 kg/hp
  • Lowest highway consumption
    5.0 L/100 km
    47.0 mpg US
    56.5 mpg UK
  • Lowest CO2 emissions
    138 g/km
  • Largest trunk
    359 L
  • Best performance score
    49/100

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Highest torque
    450 Nm
    332 lb-ft
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    5.5 L/100 km
    42.8 mpg US
    51.4 mpg UK
  • Lowest city consumption
    6.3 L/100 km
    37.3 mpg US
    44.8 mpg UK
  • Best estimated range
    1,273 km
    791 mi
  • Best overall score
    59/100
  • Best economy score
    92/100
  • Best practicality score
    81/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelDS4 Crossback1.6 THPFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210hp157kW
210hp157kW
Torque
285Nm210lb-ft
450Nm332lb-ft
Curb weight
1,387kg3,058lb
1,704kg3,757lb
Gross weight
1,845kg4,068lb
2,620kg5,776lb
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
To 99% top speed
102.4s99% target: 233 km/h / 145 mph
Calculated
100.5s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
8.4s
8.9s
0-200 km/h
36.1s
Calculated
53.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
8.0s
Calculated
8.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
5.9L/100 km39.9mpg US47.9mpg UK
5.5L/100 km42.8mpg US51.4mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
7.6L/100 km30.9mpg US37.2mpg UK
6.3L/100 km37.3mpg US44.8mpg UK
Fuel consumption highway
5L/100 km47mpg US56.5mpg UK
5.1L/100 km46.1mpg US55.4mpg UK
Quarter mile
16.1s
Calculated
16.4s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
151hp/t113kW/t69hp/1000 lb
Calculated
123hp/t92kW/t56hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
205Nm/t137lb-ft/ton
Calculated
264Nm/t177lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
1,017km632mi
Calculated
1,273km791mi
Calculated
Displacement
1,598cc98cu in
1,997cc122cu in
Length
4,284mm169in
4,848mm191in
Width
1,810mm71in
1,916mm75in
Height
1,535mm60in
1,747mm69in
Wheelbase
2,612mm103in
2,849mm112in
Front track
1,532mm60in
1,606mm63in
Rear track
1,527mm60in
1,606mm63in
Ground clearance-
124mm5in
Trunk volume
359L
300L
Max trunk volume-
2,339L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
60L
70L
CO2 emissions
138g/km
144g/km

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THPFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCiPowerTorque
  • DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP: Power / Torque
  • Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP6,000 rpm1,750 rpm6,250 rpm
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi3,750 rpm2,000-2,250 rpm4,000 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricDS4 Crossback1.6 THPFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
8.0 s
8.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
8.4 s
8.9 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
36.1 s
53.1 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.7 s
2.6 s
330 ft
101 m
7.0 s
7.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
10.5 s
10.7 s
1000 ft
305 m
13.5 s
13.8 s
1/4 mile
402 m
16.1 s
16.4 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
145 km/h
90 mph
139 km/h
86 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
210 hp
157 kW
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
450 Nm
332 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,704 kg
3,757 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
235 km/h
146 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
214 km/h
133 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP8.4 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi8.9 s

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP and Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi: 0.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
1,017 km
632 mi
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
1,273 km
791 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
210 hp
157 kW
8.4 s
235 km/h
146 mph
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
210 hp
157 kW
8.9 s
214 km/h
133 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
359 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,284 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.4 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
0-100 km/h8.9 s
Top speed
214 km/h
133 mph
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
8.4 s
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
8.9 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
DS4 Crossback1.6 THP
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleDS4 Crossback1.6 THPFordGalaxy III2.0 TDCi
Power
210 hp
157 kW
210 hp
157 kW
Torque
285 Nm
210 lb-ft
450 Nm
332 lb-ft
Acceleration
8.4 s
8.9 s
Top speed
235 km/h
146 mph
214 km/h
133 mph
Lightness
1,387 kg
3,058 lb
1,704 kg
3,757 lb
Fuel consumption
5.9 L/100 km
39.9 mpg US
47.9 mpg UK
5.5 L/100 km
42.8 mpg US
51.4 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
359 L
12.7 cu ft
Length
4,284 mm
168.7 in
Height
1,535 mm
60.4 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Length
4,848 mm
190.9 in
Height
1,747 mm
68.8 in
Range score
1,017 km
632 mi
1,273 km
791 mi
CO2 score
138 g/km
144 g/km
Trunk score
359 L
12.7 cu ft
300 L
10.6 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
151 hp/t
113 kW/t
6.6 kg/hp
123 hp/t
92 kW/t
8.1 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleDS 4 Crossback 1.6 THPFord Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Consumption5.9 L/100 km39.9 mpg US47.9 mpg UK5.5 L/100 km42.8 mpg US51.4 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km10.33 LC100 km9.63 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi16.62 LC100 mi15.49 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used885 L234 US gal195 UK gal825 L218 US gal181 UK gal
Annual fuel cost1,549 LC/year1,444 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP

  • Is 317 kg lighter
  • Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 21 km/h (13 mph) higher top speed
  • Has 28 hp/t better power-to-weight
  • Has 59 L more trunk volume
  • Emits 6 g/km less CO2

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Most powerful
  • Lightest
  • Best power-to-weight ratio
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Highest combined fuel consumption

Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi

  • Has 165 Nm more
  • Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 256 km (159 mi) more estimated range

Pros

  • Highest torque
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best estimated range

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed
  • Smallest trunk
  • Highest CO2 emissions

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP
Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

1.6 THP
1.6 TCe
VS
DS4 Crossback1.6 THPvsRenaultEspace V1.6 TCe
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX II2.0 TDCi
1.6 THP
2.0 D4
VS
DS4 Crossback1.6 THPvsVolvoV40 Cross CountryFacelift 20162.0 D4
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TDCi
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX IIFacelift 20152.0 TDCi
1.6 THP
2.0 T5
VS
DS4 Crossback1.6 THPvsVolvoV40 Cross Country2.0 T5
2.0 TDCi
2.0 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAXFacelift 20102.0 EcoBoost
1.6 THP
35 TFSI
VS
DS4 Crossback1.6 THPvsAUDIA1 citycarver (GB)35 TFSI
2.0 TDCi
1.6 EcoBoost
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordC-MAX II1.6 EcoBoost
1.6 THP
1.3 TCe
VS
DS4 Crossback1.6 THPvsRenaultCaptur II1.3 TCe
2.0 TDCi
2.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsFordS-MAX IIFacelift 20192.0 Bi-Turbo EcoBlue
1.6 THP
1.5 TSI
VS
DS4 Crossback1.6 THPvsVolkswagenTaigo1.5 TSI
2.0 TDCi
2.0 TSI
VS
FordGalaxy III2.0 TDCivsVolkswagenSharan IIFacelift 20152.0 TSI
DS 4 Crossback 1.6 THP vs Ford Galaxy III 2.0 TDCi - car comparison - FastVsFaster