Ferrari 512 TR
Car comparison
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48VvsDodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDodge Viper SR I
8.0 V10
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
- Fastest top speed314 km/h195 mph
- Most powerful428 hp319 kW
- Best power-to-weight269 hp/t201 kW/t3.7 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range847 km527 mi
- Best performance score80/100
- Best economy score75/100
Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.5 s
- Highest torque626 Nm462 lb-ft
- Lightest1,532 kg3,377 lb
- Lowest city consumption19.6 L/100 km12.0 mpg US14.4 mpg UK
- Best overall score68/100
- Best practicality score43/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 428hp319kW | 406hp303kW |
| Torque | 491Nm362lb-ft | 626Nm462lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,590kg3,505lb | 1,532kg3,377lb |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 74.1s99% target: 311 km/h / 193 mph Calculated | 51.8s99% target: 263 km/h / 164 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.8s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 14.0s Calculated | 14.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.6s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 15.7L/100 km15mpg US18.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 25.1L/100 km9.4mpg US11.3mpg UK | 19.6L/100 km12mpg US14.4mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.7s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 269hp/t201kW/t122hp/1000 lb Calculated | 265hp/t198kW/t120hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 309Nm/t207lb-ft/ton Calculated | 409Nm/t273lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 847km527mi Calculated | 529km328mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 4,943cc302cu in | 7,994cc488cu in |
| Length | 4,480mm176in | 4,448mm175in |
| Width | 1,975mm78in | 1,924mm76in |
| Height | 1,135mm45in | 1,117mm44in |
| Wheelbase | 2,550mm100in | 2,444mm96in |
| Front track | 1,530mm60in | 1,514mm60in |
| Rear track | 1,645mm65in | 1,538mm61in |
| Max trunk volume | - | 334L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 2 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 100L | 83L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: Power / Torque
- Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 6,750 rpm | 5,500 rpm | 7,000 rpm |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 4,600 rpm | 3,600 rpm | 4,850 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.6 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.8 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 14.0 s | 14.4 s |
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 266 km/h 165 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.2 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.7 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.4 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.8 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.7 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 190 km/h 118 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 428 hp 319 kW |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 406 hp 303 kW |
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V has 22 hp more than Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10.
The biggest power difference is between Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10 and Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: 22 hp (16 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 626 Nm 462 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 1,532 kg 3,377 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 266 km/h 165 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 4.8 s |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 4.5 s |
Although Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V has more power, Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10 and Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V and Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10: 3.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 847 km 527 mi |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 529 km 328 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 428 hp 319 kW | 4.8 s | 314 km/h 195 mph |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 406 hp 303 kW | 4.5 s | 266 km/h 165 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 |
| 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 4.8 s |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Ferrari512 TR4.9 i V12 48V | DodgeViper SR I8.0 V10 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 428 hp 319 kW | 406 hp 303 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 491 Nm 362 lb-ft | 626 Nm 462 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.8 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 314 km/h 195 mph | 266 km/h 165 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,590 kg 3,505 lb | 1,532 kg 3,377 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km 15.0 mpg US 18.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 847 km 527 mi | 529 km 328 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | - | 334 L 11.8 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 269 hp/t 201 kW/t 3.7 kg/hp | 265 hp/t 198 kW/t 3.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V | Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 15.7 L/100 km15 mpg US18 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 27.47 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 44.22 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 2,355 L622 US gal518 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 4,121 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Ferrari 512 TR 4.9 i V12 48V
- Has 22 hp more
- Has 48 km/h (30 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 3.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 4 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 319 km (198 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Dodge Viper SR I 8.0 V10
- Has 135 Nm more
- Is 58 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest torque
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























