Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016
Car comparison
Nissan GT-R (R35) · Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6vsDavid Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonDavid Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition
5.0 V8
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Quickest 0-100 km/h2.8 s
- Fastest top speed315 km/h196 mph
- Lightest1,725 kg3,803 lb
- Best power-to-weight348 hp/t259 kW/t2.9 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption17.0 L/100 km13.8 mpg US16.6 mpg UK
- Best estimated range627 km390 mi
- Largest trunk315 L
- Best overall score79/100
- Best performance score93/100
- Best economy score75/100
- Best practicality score48/100
David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8
- Most powerful601 hp448 kW
- Highest torque766 Nm565 lb-ft
- Lowest highway consumption8.6 L/100 km27.4 mpg US32.8 mpg UK
Specification comparison
| Model | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 600hp447kW | 601hp448kW |
| Torque | 652Nm481lb-ft | 766Nm565lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,725kg3,803lb | 1,920kg4,233lb |
| Gross weight | 2,200kg4,850lb | - |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 38.6s99% target: 312 km/h / 194 mph Calculated | 52.1s99% target: 262 km/h / 163 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 2.8s | 4.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 7.8s Calculated | 14.2s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 2.7s Calculated | 4.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 11.8L/100 km19.9mpg US23.9mpg UK | 12.3L/100 km19.1mpg US23.0mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 17L/100 km13.8mpg US16.6mpg UK | 18.9L/100 km12.4mpg US14.9mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 8.8L/100 km26.7mpg US32.1mpg UK | 8.6L/100 km27.4mpg US32.8mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 10.2s Calculated | 12.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 348hp/t259kW/t158hp/1000 lb Calculated | 313hp/t233kW/t142hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 378Nm/t253lb-ft/ton Calculated | 399Nm/t267lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 627km390mi Calculated | 574km357mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 3,799cc232cu in | 5,000cc305cu in |
| Length | 4,690mm185in | 4,760mm187in |
| Width | 1,895mm75in | 1,860mm73in |
| Height | 1,370mm54in | 1,350mm53in |
| Wheelbase | 2,780mm109in | 2,750mm108in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | - |
| Rear track | 1,600mm63in | - |
| Ground clearance | 105mm4in | - |
| Trunk volume | 315L | 243L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 502L |
| Doors | 2 | 2 |
| Seats | 4 | 2 |
| Fuel tank | 74L | 71L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 292g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6: Power / Torque
- David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 6,800 rpm | 3,600-5,600 rpm | 7,050 rpm |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 6,000-6,500 rpm | 4,030 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 2.7 s | 4.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 2.8 s | 4.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 7.8 s | 14.2 s |
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 1.8 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 4.5 s | 5.4 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 6.7 s | 8.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 8.6 s | 10.4 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 10.2 s | 12.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 229 km/h 143 mph | 188 km/h 117 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 601 hp 448 kW |
David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8 has 1 hp more than Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6.
The biggest power difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8: 1 hp (1 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 766 Nm 565 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 2.8 s |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 4.3 s |
Although David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8 has more power, Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8: 1.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 and David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8: 0.5 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 627 km 390 mi |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 574 km 357 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 600 hp 447 kW | 2.8 s | 315 km/h 196 mph |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 601 hp 448 kW | 4.3 s | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 |
| 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | ||||||
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 |
| 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 2.8 s |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | 4.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK |
| David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | 313 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | NissanGT-R (R35)Facelift 2016Nismo 3.8 V6 | David BrownSpeedback Silverstone Edition5.0 V8 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 600 hp 447 kW | 601 hp 448 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 652 Nm 481 lb-ft | 766 Nm 565 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 2.8 s | 4.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 315 km/h 196 mph | Unrestricted 265 km/h165 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,725 kg 3,803 lb | 1,920 kg 4,233 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 11.8 L/100 km 19.9 mpg US 23.9 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km 19.1 mpg US 23.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 627 km 390 mi | 574 km 357 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 292 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 315 L 11.1 cu ft | 243 L 8.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 348 hp/t 259 kW/t 2.9 kg/hp | 313 hp/t 233 kW/t 3.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6 | David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 11.8 L/100 km19.9 mpg US23.9 mpg UK | 12.3 L/100 km19.1 mpg US23 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 20.65 LC100 km | 21.53 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 33.23 LC100 mi | 34.64 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,770 L468 US gal389 UK gal | 1,845 L487 US gal406 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 3,098 LC/year | 3,229 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Nissan GT-R (R35) Facelift 2016 Nismo 3.8 V6
- Is 195 kg lighter
- Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 50 km/h (31 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 0.5 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 35 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 53 km (33 mi) more estimated range
- Has 72 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
David Brown Speedback Silverstone Edition 5.0 V8
- Has 1 hp more
- Has 114 Nm more
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























