Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 250vsCupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
2.0 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.0 s
- Fastest top speed236 km/h147 mph
- Most powerful224 hp167 kW
- Highest torque350 Nm258 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight133 hp/t99 kW/t7.5 kg/hp
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score65/100
- Best performance score54/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Lightest1,665 kg3,671 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range750 km466 mi
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 224hp167kW | 204hp152kW |
| Torque | 350Nm258lb-ft | 320Nm236lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,690kg3,726lb | 1,665kg3,671lb |
| Gross weight | 2,265kg4,993lb | 2,280kg5,027lb |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 234 km/h / 145 mph Calculated | 77.2s99% target: 223 km/h / 138 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.0s | 7.1s |
| 0-200 km/h | 28.3s Calculated | 32.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.6s Calculated | 6.7s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.0s Calculated | 15.1s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 133hp/t99kW/t60hp/1000 lb Calculated | 123hp/t91kW/t56hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 207Nm/t139lb-ft/ton Calculated | 192Nm/t129lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 714km444mi Calculated | 750km466mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,991cc121cu in | 1,984cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,634mm182in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,697mm67in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,829mm111in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,604mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,604mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 135mm5in | - |
| Trunk volume | 565L | 540L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,800L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 60L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 4,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,400 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.6 s | 6.7 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.0 s | 7.1 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 28.3 s | 32.8 s |
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.5 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.6 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.8 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.6 s | 12.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.0 s | 15.1 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 155 km/h 97 mph | 152 km/h 95 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 has 20 hp more than Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250: 20 hp (15 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 225 km/h 140 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 7.0 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 7.1 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 and Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI: 0.1 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 714 km 444 mi |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 750 km 466 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 224 hp 167 kW | 7.0 s | 236 km/h 147 mph |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.1 s | 225 km/h 140 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.0 s |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 7.1 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 250 | CupraTerramar2.0 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 224 hp 167 kW | 204 hp 152 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 350 Nm 258 lb-ft | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.0 s | 7.1 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 236 km/h 147 mph | 225 km/h 140 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | 1,665 kg 3,671 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 714 km 444 mi | 750 km 466 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | 540 L 19.1 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 133 hp/t 99 kW/t 7.5 kg/hp | 123 hp/t 91 kW/t 8.2 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250 | Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 14.70 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,205 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 250
- Has 20 hp more
- Has 30 Nm more
- Is 0.1 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 11 km/h (7 mph) higher top speed
- Has 10 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 25 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
Cupra Terramar 2.0 TSI
- Is 25 kg lighter
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 36 km (22 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























