WEY 03
Car comparison
WEY 03 2.0LvsCupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
WEY 03 2.0L
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed240 km/h149 mph Unrestricted230 km/h143 mph Restricted
- Most powerful204 hp152 kW
- Highest torque320 Nm236 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight97 hp/t72 kW/t10.3 kg/hp
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range11,000 km6,835 mi
- Largest trunk517 L
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score50/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Lightest1,829 kg4,032 lb
Specification comparison
| Model | WEY032.0L | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 204hp152kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 320Nm236lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,100kg4,630lb | 1,829kg4,032lb |
| Gross weight | 2,550kg5,622lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Calculated | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 101.2s99% target: 238 km/h / 148 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 31.8s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.2s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 152Nm/t102lb-ft/ton Calculated | 137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 11,000km6,835mi Calculated | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,998cc122cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,668mm184in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,890mm74in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,730mm68in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,745mm108in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | - | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | - | 1,580mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 517L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,289L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | WEY032.0L | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 31.8 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph Likely limited | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.2 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 150 km/h 93 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 204 hp 152 kW |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
WEY 03 2.0L has 27 hp more than Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and WEY 03 2.0L: 27 hp (20 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 7.3 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 11,000 km 6,835 mi |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 204 hp 152 kW | 7.3 s | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEY032.0L |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| WEY032.0L |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
WEY 03 2.0L is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| WEY032.0L | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | WEY032.0L | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 204 hp 152 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 320 Nm 236 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 240 km/h149 mph Restricted 230 km/h143 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,100 kg 4,630 lb | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 11,000 km 6,835 mi | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 517 L 18.3 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | WEY 03 2.0L | Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 0.88 LC100 km | 0.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 131.25 LC/year | 131.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
WEY 03 2.0L
- Has 27 hp more
- Has 70 Nm more
- Has 25 km/h (16 mph) higher top speed
- Has 0 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 2,000 km (1,243 mi) more estimated range
- Has 67 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Heaviest
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Is 271 kg lighter
Pros
- Lightest
Cons
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























