Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSIvsOmoda 5 1.6 TGDI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonOmoda 5
1.6 TGDI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range9,000 km5,592 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best overall score58/100
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI
- Most powerful186 hp139 kW
- Highest torque275 Nm203 lb-ft
- Lightest1,444 kg3,183 lb
- Best power-to-weight129 hp/t96 kW/t7.8 kg/hp
- Best performance score47/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | Omoda51.6 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 186hp139kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 275Nm203lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,829kg4,032lb | 1,444kg3,183lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 1,875kg4,134lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 68.2s99% target: 204 km/h / 127 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.8s |
| 0-200 km/h | 40.9s Calculated | 50.8s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 129hp/t96kW/t58hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton Calculated | 190Nm/t127lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated | 680km423mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,598cc98cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,400mm173in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,830mm72in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,588mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,630mm104in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,550mm61in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,550mm61in |
| Ground clearance | - | 164mm6in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 360L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,149L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 51L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 5,500 rpm | 2,000-4,000 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | Omoda51.6 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.8 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 40.9 s | 50.8 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 186 hp 139 kW |
Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI has 9 hp more than Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI: 9 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 206 km/h 128 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 7.8 s |
Although Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI has more power, Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI: 0.5 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI: 7.0 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 680 km 423 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 186 hp 139 kW | 7.8 s | 206 km/h 128 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Omoda51.6 TGDI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Omoda51.6 TGDI |
| 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | 7.8 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| Omoda51.6 TGDI | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | Omoda51.6 TGDI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 186 hp 139 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 275 Nm 203 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.8 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 206 km/h 128 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb | 1,444 kg 3,183 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km 31.4 mpg US 37.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | 680 km 423 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 360 L 12.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 129 hp/t 96 kW/t 7.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI | Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK | 7.5 L/100 km31.4 mpg US37.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 0.88 LC100 km | 13.13 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi | 21.12 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal | 1,125 L297 US gal247 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 131.25 LC/year | 1,969 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Is 0.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 km/h (6 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 7.0 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8,320 km (5,170 mi) more estimated range
- Has 90 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
Omoda 5 1.6 TGDI
- Has 9 hp more
- Has 25 Nm more
- Is 385 kg lighter
- Has 32 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























