Cupra Terramar
Car comparison
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSIvsMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023 GLB 220
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonMercedes-Benz GLB (X247) · Facelift 2023
GLB 220
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque300 Nm221 lb-ft
- Lightest1,690 kg3,726 lb
- Best power-to-weight112 hp/t84 kW/t8.9 kg/hp
- Largest trunk565 L
- Best overall score60/100
- Best performance score47/100
- Best practicality score87/100
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Fastest top speed215 km/h134 mph
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range9,000 km5,592 mi
- Best economy score100/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 177hp132kW | 190hp142kW |
| Torque | 250Nm184lb-ft | 300Nm221lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,829kg4,032lb | 1,690kg3,726lb |
| Gross weight | 2,420kg5,335lb | 2,265kg4,993lb |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 78.7s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated | 79.1s99% target: 212 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.3s | 7.9s |
| 0-200 km/h | 41.0s Calculated | 43.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 6.9s Calculated | 7.5s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK | 8.4L/100 km28mpg US33.6mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.3s Calculated | 15.7s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated | 112hp/t84kW/t51hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton Calculated | 178Nm/t119lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated | 714km444mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,498cc91cu in | 1,991cc121cu in |
| Length | 4,519mm178in | 4,634mm182in |
| Width | 1,869mm74in | 1,834mm72in |
| Height | 1,586mm62in | 1,697mm67in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,829mm111in |
| Front track | 1,590mm63in | 1,604mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,580mm62in | 1,604mm63in |
| Ground clearance | - | 135mm5in |
| Trunk volume | 450L | 565L |
| Max trunk volume | - | 1,800L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 45L | 60L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 5,500-6,100 rpm | 1,800-4,000 rpm | 6,350 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 6.9 s | 7.5 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.3 s | 7.9 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 41.0 s | 43.1 s |
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.4 s | 2.6 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.5 s | 6.8 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 9.9 s | 10.3 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 12.8 s | 13.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.3 s | 15.7 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 146 km/h 91 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 190 hp 142 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 has 13 hp more than Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 214 km/h 133 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 7.9 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 has more power, Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: 0.6 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220: 7.9 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 714 km 444 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.9 s | 214 km/h 133 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 |
| 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | 7.9 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
| Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | Mercedes-BenzGLB (X247)Facelift 2023GLB 220 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 177 hp 132 kW | 190 hp 142 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | 300 Nm 221 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.3 s | 7.9 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 215 km/h 134 mph | 214 km/h 133 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb | 1,690 kg 3,726 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km 28.0 mpg US 33.6 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | 714 km 444 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | 565 L 20.0 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 112 hp/t 84 kW/t 8.9 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI | Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK | 8.4 L/100 km28 mpg US33.6 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 0.88 LC100 km | 14.70 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi | 23.66 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal | 1,260 L333 US gal277 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 131.25 LC/year | 2,205 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Is 0.6 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 1 km/h (1 mph) higher top speed
- Uses 7.9 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8,286 km (5,149 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Mercedes-Benz GLB (X247) Facelift 2023 GLB 220
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 50 Nm more
- Is 139 kg lighter
- Has 16 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 115 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























