Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023
Car comparison
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) · Facelift 2023 GLA 220dvsCupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonCupra Terramar
1.5 TSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
- Fastest top speed219 km/h136 mph
- Most powerful190 hp142 kW
- Highest torque400 Nm295 lb-ft
- Lightest1,650 kg3,638 lb
- Best power-to-weight115 hp/t86 kW/t8.7 kg/hp
- Best overall score61/100
- Best performance score51/100
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h7.3 s
- Lowest combined fuel consumption0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565.0 mpg UK
- Best estimated range9,000 km5,592 mi
- Largest trunk450 L
- Best economy score100/100
- Best practicality score82/100
Specification comparison
| Model | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 190hp142kW | 177hp132kW |
| Torque | 400Nm295lb-ft | 250Nm184lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,650kg3,638lb | 1,829kg4,032lb |
| Gross weight | 2,225kg4,905lb | 2,420kg5,335lb |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 79.2s99% target: 217 km/h / 135 mph Calculated | 78.5s99% target: 213 km/h / 132 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 7.5s | 7.3s |
| 0-200 km/h | 37.9s Calculated | 40.9s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 7.1s Calculated | 6.9s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 6.2L/100 km37.9mpg US45.6mpg UK | 0.5L/100 km470.4mpg US565.0mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 15.4s Calculated | 15.3s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 115hp/t86kW/t52hp/1000 lb Calculated | 97hp/t72kW/t44hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 242Nm/t162lb-ft/ton Calculated | 137Nm/t91lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 823km511mi Calculated | 9,000km5,592mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 1,950cc119cu in | 1,498cc91cu in |
| Length | 4,412mm174in | 4,519mm178in |
| Width | 1,834mm72in | 1,869mm74in |
| Height | 1,616mm64in | 1,586mm62in |
| Wheelbase | 2,729mm107in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,605mm63in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,606mm63in | 1,580mm62in |
| Ground clearance | 143mm6in | - |
| Trunk volume | 427L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,422L | - |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 51L | 45L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: Power / Torque
- Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 3,800 rpm | 1,600-2,600 rpm | 4,050 rpm |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 5,500-6,000 rpm | 1,500-4,000 rpm | 6,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 7.1 s | 6.9 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 7.5 s | 7.3 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 37.9 s | 40.9 s |
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.5 s | 2.4 s |
330 ft 101 m | 6.7 s | 6.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 10.1 s | 9.9 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 13.0 s | 12.8 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 15.4 s | 15.3 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 148 km/h 92 mph | 148 km/h 92 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW |
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d has 13 hp more than Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: 13 hp (10 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 215 km/h 134 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 7.5 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 7.3 s |
Although Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d has more power, Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: 0.2 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI and Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d: 5.7 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 823 km 511 mi |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 9,000 km 5,592 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 190 hp 142 kW | 7.5 s | 219 km/h 136 mph |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 177 hp 132 kW | 7.3 s | 215 km/h 134 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d |
| 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | ||||||
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI |
| 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 7.5 s |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | 7.3 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK |
| CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | Mercedes-BenzGLA (H247)Facelift 2023GLA 220d | CupraTerramar1.5 TSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 190 hp 142 kW | 177 hp 132 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | 250 Nm 184 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 7.5 s | 7.3 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | 219 km/h 136 mph | 215 km/h 134 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,650 kg 3,638 lb | 1,829 kg 4,032 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 6.2 L/100 km 37.9 mpg US 45.6 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km 470.4 mpg US 565.0 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 823 km 511 mi | 9,000 km 5,592 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 427 L 15.1 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 115 hp/t 86 kW/t 8.7 kg/hp | 97 hp/t 72 kW/t 10.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d | Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 6.2 L/100 km37.9 mpg US45.6 mpg UK | 0.5 L/100 km470.4 mpg US565 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 10.85 LC100 km | 0.88 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 17.46 LC100 mi | 1.41 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 930 L246 US gal205 UK gal | 75 L20 US gal16 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 1,628 LC/year | 131.25 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Mercedes-Benz GLA (H247) Facelift 2023 GLA 220d
- Has 13 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 179 kg lighter
- Has 4 km/h (2 mph) higher top speed
- Has 18 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
Cupra Terramar 1.5 TSI
- Is 0.2 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Uses 5.7 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 8,177 km (5,081 mi) more estimated range
- Has 23 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Lowest power
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























