Car comparison

Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSIvsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400

Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.

New comparison

Cupra Formentor

VZ5 2.5 TSI

390 hp2480 ccGasolineAWDDual-clutchTurbochargedSUV2021-2023
VS

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III

3.0 P400

400 hp2996 ccGasolineAWDAutomaticTurbochargedSUV2022-present

Comparison overview

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Best choices

Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h
    4.2 s
  • Fastest top speed
    260 km/h
    162 mph Unrestricted
    250 km/h
    155 mph Restricted
  • Lightest
    1,608 kg
    3,545 lb
  • Best power-to-weight
    243 hp/t
    181 kW/t
    4.1 kg/hp
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
    9.3 L/100 km
    25.3 mpg US
    30.4 mpg UK
  • Best overall score
    77/100
  • Best performance score
    75/100
  • Best economy score
    82/100

Specification comparison

Specification comparison
ModelCupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSILand RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
Power
390hp291kW
400hp298kW
Torque
480Nm354lb-ft
550Nm406lb-ft
Curb weight
1,608kg3,545lb
2,310kg5,093lb
Gross weight
2,120kg4,674lb
3,220kg7,099lb
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Calculated
242 km/h
150 mph
To 99% top speed
43.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph
Calculated
66.6s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph
Calculated
0-100 km/h
4.2s
5.7s
0-200 km/h
13.3s
Calculated
22.1s
Calculated
0-60 mph
4.0s
Calculated
5.4s
Calculated
Fuel consumption
9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK
10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK
Fuel consumption city
12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK
-
Fuel consumption highway
7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK
-
Quarter mile
12.1s
Calculated
13.9s
Calculated
Power-to-weight
243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb
Calculated
173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb
Calculated
Torque-to-weight
299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton
Calculated
238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton
Calculated
Estimated range
591km367mi
Calculated
900km559mi
Calculated
Displacement
2,480cc151cu in
2,996cc183cu in
Length
4,468mm176in
4,946mm195in
Width
1,852mm73in
-
Height
1,505mm59in
1,820mm72in
Wheelbase
2,681mm106in
2,997mm118in
Front track
1,587mm62in
1,702mm67in
Rear track
1,561mm61in
1,704mm67in
Ground clearance-
281mm11in
Trunk volume
410L
450L
Max trunk volume
1,465L
1,860L
Doors
5
5
Seats
5
5
Fuel tank
55L
90L

Performance charts

Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.

Dyno simulation

Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.

Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSILand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400PowerTorque
  • Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI: Power / Torque
  • Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400: Power / Torque
Dyno simulation data table
VehiclePeak power RPMPeak torque RPMMax engine speed
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI5,700-7,000 rpm2,250-5,700 rpm7,250 rpm
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P4005,500-6,500 rpm2,000-5,000 rpm6,750 rpm

Acceleration curve

Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.

Acceleration and drag-race table
MetricCupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSILand RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
Acceleration checkpoints
0-60 mph
0-97 km/h
4.0 s
5.4 s
0-100 km/h
0-62 mph
4.2 s
5.7 s
0-200 km/h
0-124 mph
13.3 s
22.1 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Likely limited
242 km/h
150 mph
Drag race simulation
60 ft
18 m
2.1 s
2.3 s
330 ft
101 m
5.4 s
6.0 s
1/8 mile
201 m
8.0 s
9.1 s
1000 ft
305 m
10.3 s
11.7 s
1/4 mile
402 m
12.1 s
13.9 s
Trap speed
1/4 mile
402 m
192 km/h
120 mph
166 km/h
103 mph

Power comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
390 hp
291 kW
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
400 hp
298 kW

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400 has 10 hp more than Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI.

The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400: 10 hp (7 kW).

Torque comparison

Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
550 Nm
406 lb-ft

Curb weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
1,608 kg
3,545 lb
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
2,310 kg
5,093 lb

Top speed without limiter comparison

Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
242 km/h
150 mph

0-100 km/h comparison

Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds

Although Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400 has more power, Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.

The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400: 1.5 s.

Fuel consumption comparison

Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400: 0.7 L/100 km.

Power-to-weight comparison

Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
243 hp/t
181 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp

Estimated range comparison

Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi

Chart data table
VehicleValue
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
591 km
367 mi
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
900 km
559 mi

Performance spider chart

Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.

Chart data table
VehiclePowerAccelerationTop speed
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
390 hp
291 kW
4.2 s
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
400 hp
298 kW
5.7 s
242 km/h
150 mph

Most attractive quadrant

Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.

Chart data table
VehiclePerformance scorePracticality score
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
Power
390 hp
291 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,468 mm
175.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,946 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,820 mm
71.7 in

Performance vs fuel economy

Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.

Performance vs fuel economy data table
VehiclePerformance scoreFuel economy score
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
Power
390 hp
291 kW
0-100 km/h4.2 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
Power
400 hp
298 kW
0-100 km/h5.7 s
Top speed
242 km/h
150 mph
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption

Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.

Acceleration vs fuel consumption data table
VehicleFuel consumption, L/100 km0-100 km/h, s
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
4.2 s
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
5.7 s

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption

The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.

Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption data table
VehiclePower-to-weight, hp/tFuel consumption, L/100 km
CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI
243 hp/t
181 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK

Detailed score breakdown

Detailed score breakdown
VehicleCupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSILand RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400
Power
390 hp
291 kW
400 hp
298 kW
Torque
480 Nm
354 lb-ft
550 Nm
406 lb-ft
Acceleration
4.2 s
5.7 s
Top speed
Unrestricted
260 km/h162 mph
Restricted
250 km/h155 mph
242 km/h
150 mph
Lightness
1,608 kg
3,545 lb
2,310 kg
5,093 lb
Fuel consumption
9.3 L/100 km
25.3 mpg US
30.4 mpg UK
10.0 L/100 km
23.5 mpg US
28.2 mpg UK
Practicality
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
410 L
14.5 cu ft
Length
4,468 mm
175.9 in
Height
1,505 mm
59.3 in
Doors/seats
5 doors
5 seats
Trunk
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Length
4,946 mm
194.7 in
Height
1,820 mm
71.7 in
Range score
591 km
367 mi
900 km
559 mi
Trunk score
410 L
14.5 cu ft
450 L
15.9 cu ft
Power-to-weight score
243 hp/t
181 kW/t
4.1 kg/hp
173 hp/t
129 kW/t
5.8 kg/hp
Overall
Fixed score
Fixed score

Fuel cost and annual usage

Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.

Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.

LC = Local Currency

Fuel cost and annual usage
VehicleCupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSILand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400
Consumption9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
Cost / 100 km16.28 LC100 km17.50 LC100 km
Cost / 100 mi26.19 LC100 mi28.16 LC100 mi
Annual fuel used1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal
Annual fuel cost2,441 LC/year2,625 LC/year

Head-to-head comparisons

Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI

  • Is 702 kg lighter
  • Is 1.5 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
  • Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
  • Uses 0.7 L/100 km less fuel
  • Has 69 hp/t better power-to-weight

Pros

  • Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
  • Highest top speed
  • Lightest
  • Lowest combined fuel consumption
  • Best power-to-weight ratio

Cons

  • Lowest power
  • Smallest trunk

Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400

  • Has 10 hp more
  • Has 70 Nm more
  • Has 309 km (192 mi) more estimated range
  • Has 40 L more trunk volume

Pros

  • Most powerful
  • Highest torque
  • Best estimated range
  • Largest trunk

Cons

  • Slowest 0-100 km/h
  • Highest combined fuel consumption
  • Heaviest
  • Lowest top speed

Choose cars to compare

Brand
Model
Generation
Engine or modification
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400
Compare selected cars
2 vehicles selected

Popular comparisons

Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI vs Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400 - car comparison - FastVsFaster