Cupra Formentor
Car comparison
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSIvsAUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonAUDI RSQ3 (F3)
2.5 TFSI
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
AUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK
- Lowest city consumption11.5 L/100 km20.5 mpg US24.6 mpg UK
- Lowest highway consumption7.4 L/100 km31.8 mpg US38.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range708 km440 mi
- Largest trunk530 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best economy score83/100
- Best practicality score85/100
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI
- Quickest 0-100 km/h4.2 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Highest torque480 Nm354 lb-ft
- Lightest1,608 kg3,545 lb
- Best power-to-weight243 hp/t181 kW/t4.1 kg/hp
- Best performance score75/100
Specification comparison
| Model | CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 390hp291kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 480Nm354lb-ft | 480Nm354lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 1,608kg3,545lb | 1,715kg3,781lb |
| Gross weight | 2,120kg4,674lb | 2,250kg4,960lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated |
| To 99% top speed | 43.7s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 51.9s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 4.2s | 4.5s |
| 0-200 km/h | 13.3s Calculated | 15.0s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 4.0s Calculated | 4.3s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 9.3L/100 km25.3mpg US30.4mpg UK | 8.9L/100 km26.4mpg US31.7mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | 12.2L/100 km19.3mpg US23.2mpg UK | 11.5L/100 km20.5mpg US24.6mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | 7.5L/100 km31.4mpg US37.7mpg UK | 7.4L/100 km31.8mpg US38.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 12.1s Calculated | 12.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 243hp/t181kW/t110hp/1000 lb Calculated | 233hp/t174kW/t106hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 299Nm/t200lb-ft/ton Calculated | 280Nm/t187lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 591km367mi Calculated | 708km440mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,480cc151cu in | 2,480cc151cu in |
| Length | 4,468mm176in | 4,506mm177in |
| Width | 1,852mm73in | 1,851mm73in |
| Height | 1,505mm59in | 1,602mm63in |
| Wheelbase | 2,681mm106in | 2,680mm106in |
| Front track | 1,587mm62in | 1,590mm63in |
| Rear track | 1,561mm61in | 1,583mm62in |
| Trunk volume | 410L | 530L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,465L | 1,525L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 55L | 63L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI: Power / Torque
- AUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 5,700-7,000 rpm | 2,250-5,700 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 5,850-7,000 rpm | 1,950-5,850 rpm | 7,250 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 4.0 s | 4.3 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 4.2 s | 4.5 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 13.3 s | 15.0 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Limited |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.1 s | 2.1 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.4 s | 5.5 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.0 s | 8.2 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 10.3 s | 10.6 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 12.1 s | 12.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 192 km/h 120 mph | 185 km/h 115 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 390 hp 291 kW |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW |
AUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI has 10 hp more than Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI.
The biggest power difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI and AUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI: 10 hp (7 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 1,608 kg 3,545 lb |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 4.2 s |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 4.5 s |
Although AUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI has more power, Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI is quicker from 0-100 km/h.
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI and AUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 591 km 367 mi |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 708 km 440 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 390 hp 291 kW | 4.2 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 400 hp 298 kW | 4.5 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI |
| 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | ||||||
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI |
| 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 4.2 s |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | 4.5 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK |
| AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | CupraFormentorVZ5 2.5 TSI | AUDIRSQ3 (F3)2.5 TFSI | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 390 hp 291 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | 480 Nm 354 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 4.2 s | 4.5 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 1,608 kg 3,545 lb | 1,715 kg 3,781 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 9.3 L/100 km 25.3 mpg US 30.4 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km 26.4 mpg US 31.7 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 591 km 367 mi | 708 km 440 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 410 L 14.5 cu ft | 530 L 18.7 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 243 hp/t 181 kW/t 4.1 kg/hp | 233 hp/t 174 kW/t 4.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI | AUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 9.3 L/100 km25.3 mpg US30.4 mpg UK | 8.9 L/100 km26.4 mpg US31.7 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 16.28 LC100 km | 15.58 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 26.19 LC100 mi | 25.07 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,395 L369 US gal307 UK gal | 1,335 L353 US gal294 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,441 LC/year | 2,336 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Cupra Formentor VZ5 2.5 TSI
- Is 107 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 9 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Lowest power
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Smallest trunk
AUDI RSQ3 (F3) 2.5 TFSI
- Has 10 hp more
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 116 km (72 mi) more estimated range
- Has 120 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Most powerful
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























