Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0ivsLand Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonLand Rover Range Rover Sport III
3.0 P400
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Lightest2,028 kg4,471 lb
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Largest trunk755 L
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400
- Lowest combined fuel consumption10.0 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK
- Best estimated range900 km559 mi
- Best economy score80/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 400hp298kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 550Nm406lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,028kg4,471lb | 2,310kg5,093lb |
| Gross weight | - | 3,220kg7,099lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 70.0s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 66.6s99% target: 240 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 5.7s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.0s Calculated | 22.1s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 5.4s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 10L/100 km23.5mpg US28.2mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 13.9s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 173hp/t129kW/t79hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 238Nm/t159lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 788km490mi Calculated | 900km559mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 2,996cc183cu in |
| Length | 4,747mm187in | 4,946mm195in |
| Height | 1,664mm66in | 1,820mm72in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,997mm118in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,702mm67in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,704mm67in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 281mm11in |
| Trunk volume | 755L | 450L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,804L | 1,860L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 90L |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i: Power / Torque
- Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 5.4 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 5.7 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.0 s | 22.1 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 242 km/h 150 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.3 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.0 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.1 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 11.7 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 13.9 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 172 km/h 107 mph | 166 km/h 103 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 400 hp 298 kW |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW |
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 2,028 kg 4,471 lb |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 242 km/h 150 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 5.7 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i and Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400: 0.3 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 788 km 490 mi |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 900 km 559 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.7 s | 242 km/h 150 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 |
| 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | 5.7 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | Land RoverRange Rover Sport III3.0 P400 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 400 hp 298 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 5.7 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 242 km/h 150 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,028 kg 4,471 lb | 2,310 kg 5,093 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 10.0 L/100 km 23.5 mpg US 28.2 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 788 km 490 mi | 900 km 559 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 755 L 26.7 cu ft | 450 L 15.9 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 173 hp/t 129 kW/t 5.8 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i | Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 10 L/100 km23.5 mpg US28.2 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 17.50 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 28.16 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,500 L396 US gal330 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,625 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i
- Is 282 kg lighter
- Is 0.3 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 18 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 24 hp/t better power-to-weight
- Has 305 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Lightest
- Best power-to-weight ratio
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
Land Rover Range Rover Sport III 3.0 P400
- Uses 0.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 112 km (69 mi) more estimated range
Pros
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Heaviest
- Lowest top speed
- Smallest trunk
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























