Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020
Car comparison
Jaguar F-Pace · Facelift 2020 3.0ivsJaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
Compare specs, acceleration, fuel consumption, dimensions, practicality, and estimated running costs side by side.
New comparisonJaguar E-Pace
2.0 P300
Comparison overview
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Best choices
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i
- Quickest 0-100 km/h5.4 s
- Fastest top speed260 km/h162 mph Unrestricted250 km/h155 mph Restricted
- Most powerful400 hp298 kW
- Highest torque550 Nm406 lb-ft
- Best power-to-weight197 hp/t147 kW/t5.1 kg/hp
- Best overall score78/100
- Best performance score71/100
- Best practicality score92/100
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
- Lightest1,894 kg4,176 lb
- Lowest combined fuel consumption8.0 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK
- Best estimated range856 km532 mi
- Largest trunk1,234 L
- Best economy score85/100
Specification comparison
| Model | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Power | 400hp298kW | 300hp224kW |
| Torque | 550Nm406lb-ft | 400Nm295lb-ft |
| Curb weight | 2,028kg4,471lb | 1,894kg4,176lb |
| Gross weight | - | 2,400kg5,291lb |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Calculated | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| To 99% top speed | 72.1s99% target: 257 km/h / 160 mph Calculated | 85.0s99% target: 241 km/h / 149 mph Calculated |
| 0-100 km/h | 5.4s | 6.4s |
| 0-200 km/h | 19.3s Calculated | 26.4s Calculated |
| 0-60 mph | 5.1s Calculated | 6.1s Calculated |
| Fuel consumption | 10.4L/100 km22.6mpg US27.2mpg UK | 8L/100 km29.4mpg US35.3mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption city | - | 9.7L/100 km24.2mpg US29.1mpg UK |
| Fuel consumption highway | - | 7L/100 km33.6mpg US40.4mpg UK |
| Quarter mile | 13.5s Calculated | 14.5s Calculated |
| Power-to-weight | 197hp/t147kW/t89hp/1000 lb Calculated | 158hp/t118kW/t72hp/1000 lb Calculated |
| Torque-to-weight | 271Nm/t181lb-ft/ton Calculated | 211Nm/t141lb-ft/ton Calculated |
| Estimated range | 788km490mi Calculated | 856km532mi Calculated |
| Displacement | 2,995cc183cu in | 1,998cc122cu in |
| Length | 4,747mm187in | 4,395mm173in |
| Width | 2,071mm82in | 1,984mm78in |
| Height | 1,664mm66in | 1,649mm65in |
| Wheelbase | 2,874mm113in | 2,681mm106in |
| Front track | 1,640mm65in | 1,635mm64in |
| Rear track | 1,656mm65in | 1,634mm64in |
| Ground clearance | 213mm8in | 204mm8in |
| Trunk volume | 755L | 1,234L |
| Max trunk volume | 1,804L | 2,577L |
| Doors | 5 | 5 |
| Seats | 5 | 5 |
| Fuel tank | 82L | 69L |
| CO2 emissions | - | 181g/km |
Performance charts
Use the estimates as comparison hints and verify exact figures before making decisions.
Dyno simulation
Estimated stock-style power and torque curves by engine speed.
- Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i: Power / Torque
- Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: Power / Torque
| Vehicle | Peak power RPM | Peak torque RPM | Max engine speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 5,500-6,500 rpm | 2,000-5,000 rpm | 6,750 rpm |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 5,500 rpm | 1,500-4,500 rpm | 5,750 rpm |
Acceleration curve
Estimated speed over time for selected vehicles.
| Metric | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Acceleration checkpoints | ||
0-60 mph 0-97 km/h | 5.1 s | 6.1 s |
0-100 km/h 0-62 mph | 5.4 s | 6.4 s |
0-200 km/h 0-124 mph | 19.3 s | 26.4 s |
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph Likely limited | 243 km/h 151 mph |
| Drag race simulation | ||
60 ft 18 m | 2.2 s | 2.3 s |
330 ft 101 m | 5.9 s | 6.3 s |
1/8 mile 201 m | 8.9 s | 9.4 s |
1000 ft 305 m | 11.4 s | 12.2 s |
1/4 mile 402 m | 13.5 s | 14.5 s |
Trap speed 1/4 mile 402 m | 171 km/h 107 mph | 158 km/h 98 mph |
Power comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power. Higher is better · hp / kW
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 400 hp 298 kW |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 300 hp 224 kW |
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i has 100 hp more than Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300.
The biggest power difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i: 100 hp (75 kW).
Torque comparison
Bar comparison chart for Torque. Higher is better · Nm / lb-ft
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft |
Curb weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Curb weight. Lower is better · kg / lb
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 2,028 kg 4,471 lb |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 1,894 kg 4,176 lb |
Top speed without limiter comparison
Bar comparison chart for Top speed without limiter. Higher is better · km/h / mph
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 243 km/h 151 mph |
0-100 km/h comparison
Bar comparison chart for 0-100 km/h. Lower is better · seconds
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 5.4 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 6.4 s |
The biggest 0-100 km/h difference is between Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i and Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300: 1.0 s.
Fuel consumption comparison
Bar comparison chart for Fuel consumption. Lower is better · L/100 km / mpg US / mpg UK
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
The biggest fuel consumption difference is between Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 and Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i: 2.4 L/100 km.
Power-to-weight comparison
Bar comparison chart for Power-to-weight. Higher is better · hp/t / kW/t
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp |
Estimated range comparison
Bar comparison chart for Estimated range. Higher is better · km / mi
| Vehicle | Value |
|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 788 km 490 mi |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 856 km 532 mi |
Performance spider chart
Radar chart comparing normalized performance and fuel-consumption scores.
| Vehicle | Power | Acceleration | Top speed |
|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 400 hp 298 kW | 5.4 s | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 300 hp 224 kW | 6.4 s | 243 km/h 151 mph |
Most attractive quadrant
Scatter chart with performance score on the X axis and practicality score on the Y axis.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Practicality score | ||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 |
|
| ||||||||||||||
Performance vs fuel economy
Cars closer to the top-right corner combine stronger performance with better fuel economy scores.
| Vehicle | Performance score | Fuel economy score | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i |
| 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | ||||||
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 |
| 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i is closest to the top-right balance target for performance and fuel economy.
Acceleration vs fuel consumption
Cars closer to the lower-left corner offer a better mix of quick acceleration and low fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Fuel consumption, L/100 km | 0-100 km/h, s |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 5.4 s |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | 6.4 s |
Power-to-weight vs fuel consumption
The shaded area favors higher power-to-weight with lower combined fuel consumption.
| Vehicle | Power-to-weight, hp/t | Fuel consumption, L/100 km |
|---|---|---|
| JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK |
| JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK |
Detailed score breakdown
| Vehicle | JaguarF-PaceFacelift 20203.0i | JaguarE-Pace2.0 P300 | ||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Power | 400 hp 298 kW | 300 hp 224 kW | ||||||||||||||||
| Torque | 550 Nm 406 lb-ft | 400 Nm 295 lb-ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Acceleration | 5.4 s | 6.4 s | ||||||||||||||||
| Top speed | Unrestricted 260 km/h162 mph Restricted 250 km/h155 mph | 243 km/h 151 mph | ||||||||||||||||
| Lightness | 2,028 kg 4,471 lb | 1,894 kg 4,176 lb | ||||||||||||||||
| Fuel consumption | 10.4 L/100 km 22.6 mpg US 27.2 mpg UK | 8.0 L/100 km 29.4 mpg US 35.3 mpg UK | ||||||||||||||||
| Practicality |
|
| ||||||||||||||||
| Range score | 788 km 490 mi | 856 km 532 mi | ||||||||||||||||
| CO2 score | - | 181 g/km | ||||||||||||||||
| Trunk score | 755 L 26.7 cu ft | 1,234 L 43.6 cu ft | ||||||||||||||||
| Power-to-weight score | 197 hp/t 147 kW/t 5.1 kg/hp | 158 hp/t 118 kW/t 6.3 kg/hp | ||||||||||||||||
| Overall | Fixed score | Fixed score |
Fuel cost and annual usage
Estimate running costs from combined consumption, your annual distance, and the fuel price in your local currency.
Enter the fuel price in your local currency, for example €/L, $/gal, £/L or any other local currency.
LC = Local Currency
| Vehicle | Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i | Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300 |
|---|---|---|
| Consumption | 10.4 L/100 km22.6 mpg US27.2 mpg UK | 8 L/100 km29.4 mpg US35.3 mpg UK |
| Cost / 100 km | 18.20 LC100 km | 14.00 LC100 km |
| Cost / 100 mi | 29.29 LC100 mi | 22.53 LC100 mi |
| Annual fuel used | 1,560 L412 US gal343 UK gal | 1,200 L317 US gal264 UK gal |
| Annual fuel cost | 2,730 LC/year | 2,100 LC/year |
Head-to-head comparisons
Jaguar F-Pace Facelift 2020 3.0i
- Has 100 hp more
- Has 150 Nm more
- Is 1.0 s quicker from 0-100 km/h
- Has 17 km/h (11 mph) higher top speed
- Has 39 hp/t better power-to-weight
Pros
- Quickest 0-100 km/h in this comparison
- Highest top speed
- Most powerful
- Highest torque
- Best power-to-weight ratio
Cons
- Highest combined fuel consumption
- Heaviest
- Smallest trunk
Jaguar E-Pace 2.0 P300
- Is 134 kg lighter
- Uses 2.4 L/100 km less fuel
- Has 68 km (42 mi) more estimated range
- Has 479 L more trunk volume
Pros
- Lightest
- Lowest combined fuel consumption
- Best estimated range
- Largest trunk
Cons
- Slowest 0-100 km/h
- Lowest power
- Lowest top speed
Choose cars to compare
Popular comparisons























